Ahaha has you good! In 3 words:
Debt? What debt? (See below the subtitle concerned)
It's going to answer?
Well I try to go to my little theory by trying to do a trace of anything that was said (and even though I could be wrong: not pull)
However, I note what was said Sen_No_Sen (on the CIA behind May 68.) History repeats itself ... De Gaul must surely be part of the "axis of evil", a errorist be dangerous, and necessarily an arrant dictator!
It'll be along for once, I think that Ahmed will lose pussy and do the little (already so that the subject is too simple ...)
This is interesting on what he does not say
. But what makes us understand is that the US (almost how the rest of the liberal economy that top layer) are at the end of their system. So as like to repeat the pros extractive analysis: we are in a permanent self-sustaining system of therapeuthic hard.
What we said article is of interest, rather obvious and clear: before there is a gulf (as if half the world's GDP is concerned, we all are). What he does not say (but we did understand) ... It's all savings mechanisms voluntarily (and by the nature of the system) largely out of control (liberalism, the law of supply VS demand, etc.), we are in a runaway train that no one has so far been slow (except management by crisis, wars, stock market that crack ruining small proprietors, to create in the blood a call air and going again! ...)
But then it stops for me with this article because we swim in full hypocrisy! (Although it is very interesting and I thank 'Tophe of publishing: it is brave seen what happens behind the scenes ...)
Because the solution in credit, debt accumulation (or rather shameless interest thereof), all that, all this is only one component and article fails to mention the ( like paying a fair price for raw materials, or products under valued as tea bought $ 1 1000 be sold for $ store, not better for rubber etc). AND IT ALSO IS A FORM OF DEBT that dare not speak its name ... But it appears that?
How the system works
(Debt or inherently included)
And especially what are the instruments to know how he is (mostly)
Only a few clues, because I do not pretend to know everything, but .. So, as I understand it, economic systems between them-have a multitudes of adjustment variables
(Ever-changing upward and downward depending on market fluctuations, much like the stock market: except that here it is at the macro level of finance ...) and it is these that trends give the top-flight experts use to assess risks and make quick profits, before you could not say "phew".
It's simple right? The debt burden, coughed and coughed, it's a bit of a smokescreen, an old sea serpent that we resort to impress us. To justify "things are bad" and force us to admit our personal will (even if against heart) that we need to tighten our belts! In other bankers are really idiots, to lend us money they could not repay, while the risk calculation is their core business!
A debt? What debt?
As against the debt interest them ...
Proof is crack 2008 totally FICTITIOUS compared to workers, employment and the economy, since at bottom it is a crisis IMPORTED which hardly concerned Europe. This is where we stood we rosary debt composed of states. Of course it exists, but a state always pays his debts and interest (which have historically been very low) and it MUST SO TECHNICALLY PLAY ONLY ON FLUCTUATING YIELD AND PLAYING ON POINTS OF QUARTERS: REMEMBER US BONDS STATE iN SIXTY YEARS PERFORMANCE wAS PEANUT ... we do is still more to the Marshall Plan: the notional amount of the debt and interest I tell you ... well see totally fictitious. Pure assembly-trap of speculative finance.
daily global volume of trade on the stock exchange
: 8 000 billion dollars! 1% taxed on these exchanges for a year = 29'200 billion.
Soaring US debt (that guaranteed by the State included)
And so in my humble opinion, the truth is not there (not the debt problem, let alone imported). She is in trading volume GLOBAL markets, day after day on the financial markets
(Which should be reported to the debt level to remain relatively speaking) but chuuuut go your way: radio silence! Because then we would see maybe the drama would not be as great if all of us agreed to pay 2 or 3% more product, debt would fall quickly until completely disappear (in less than a year there would be virtually no debt on the planet, but it would take perhaps two or three years, because it would exempt countries least encourage repayment). Debts are a lure, a scarecrow which is stirred so that we focus on it (of course they exist and limiting: it is besides their essential role of targeted servo) but are inevitably partly fictitious (I will not pretend to a system or debt-money paradigm clutched erased and credits given to better-best, scratch and indiscriminate, it is not the subject of the thread, but not fall into the trap to consider debt as an obstacle while it is essentially because it would be
an engine: please note the conditional, I speak in the m ... current system).
2.0 of adjustment variables
The well attended adjustment variables and much anticipated, it's a bit of the blow constantly insider trading ... No risk of getting caught! (Or at least it helps to know where the wind blows ...)
In a purely illustrative:
- The debt ratio for countries wishing to remain in the euro area and which can not exceed theoretically 3%.
- The key to the "labor flexibility" (this time on the backs of employees) can also be considered an "adjustment variable" (sinews of war between left and employers, z'avez noticed ... SINCE they do not want you go walking on their flower beds But this has immediate repercussions on market values).
- In contrast, investment and speculation, have their own adjustment variables (there is not country by country, but sector by sector and branch by branch ...)
- The price of oil and energy in general;
- the remuneration of capital;
- Mortgage rates;
- Mining stocks;
- Etc ...
- And even consumption, households, youth, seniors or infants (short each class of "lifestyle") its own adjustment variables and even ... dead (!)
Finally almost all, could be included in that. But of course, there are strategic upon which other ... Last but not least, remember you well: at least fifty percent of human activity is "parasite" (tertiary: banking, insurance, finance, although some are very useful, while the rest is to pump the REAL value to productive sectors: primary sector% or ~ 2 3% of the maximum population, and the secondary sector ~ 20%, which we that if we remove the tertiary useful in the administration: 75% of economic activity in which we should cut out for us: of course he would take good care then people: hence the dilemma (probably insoluble without the introduction of "unconditional basic income" ... even the universal dividend.)
Crisis adjustment variables
(Not crack dung beetle)
If we want to (and what does not say the article) is that we are in a "crisis of adjustment variables" (because it is their observation that we see if there is a growth margin and not the reverse). So people are fooled by the overly simplistic definition of the word "growth" for it to mean something understandable: it is basically a whimsical term for us to swallow the pill of belt tightening! When in fact he has at least the definitions "Ésoéconomiques"
what are the adjustment variables (you'll note in passing that one speaks well of growth CURVES, which is to talk about ADJUSTMENT VARIABLE, equally fluctuating curves ...) ( "eso" because absolutely not to be disclosed to all ... The key combinations being kept confidential: we will not unpack reporters: they could talk)
It is the interaction and control it all depends the economy. Basically, the debt is only an indicator that means that a country living beyond its means, but do not say how much (since the calculation varies in nanoseconds depending on the game if goatee play different players in the market ...)
The hidden principles ofésoéconomie tell you that in fact all is well
Of course, how could it be otherwise since there was no crisis. Companies have just readjusted by firing, relocating, magnifying by purchases other in distress, or by going bankrupt and many others FAVOURABLE situations to redeploy cards and treat staff in the last ...
Because here's the scoop, it's been a few years as the economy working again quite well. but nobody knows, it is careful not to tell you ... The fall in oil prices will make it'll start donf ... BUT MOUTH SEWN until the next crisis, where we will tell you things are bad you will fuck the shit for your job (as it rigolera fresh in boardrooms, banks and insurance) ...
The whole question is to know who does what and when comes to influence this great thing, and I research the answer to the fundamental question: is an adjustment - necessary or not? - When and why and how? And if you find that NO (as just before the time T or pseudo subprime crisis has emerged and plunge the world into the doldrums .. You can only deduce that the adjustments have enjoyed some gravediggers since they were not necessary! as you will understand further by including the role of the effect of the adjustment variables.
And so obviously it was an adjustment - necessary or not? - For the major market players! And if it is not, you see me coming: ... if that's the REAL insider trading at the macroeconomic level, which is in connection with all that! (Or maybe not ...)
But what I mean is that relative to debt, there is plenty of headroom. And of course, the adjustment variables have much greater leverage than the weight of debt!
But in fact behind the scenes that is not seen too much because everyone "plays the game" or so and especially his firm peg. The more one is discreet, the more one is incognito. And it's also a question of hierarchy in the "strike force".
And in this system it's a good, such as defining what a government can do to support employment, stabilize the economy, protect its currency, etc ...
And governments inspire some respect among players because they could very quickly if they wanted to, "get off" a free electron that would violate certain rules (for others, to big to fail, they close their eyes because too big G & $ for example ...)
There are also organizations that ensure control, it's called Gendarmes Market! (In our FINMA)
After internally in the opposite sidewalk, there are conflicts between policies, as the opposition between "neo-classical" and "Keynesian". (But that would lead us very far).
After, at the macro level applies (also below) influential "actors" trying to "build models" (by market 3: goods + services, money, work) and put them in simulations the contraption and then observe the "in-vivo" (As would happen with my model, applying the updated adjustment variables and speculating upward or downward)
. Once the scenarios become more complex (then an intervener "lambda" market rarely go that far, whatever ...)
Then it gets more complicated, they compare "aggregate supply" given the principle of VS offer request ... (With the above equations it's big ...) BUT they often come to better control the companies they self-evaluate themselves (I know this is not the game, and in addition they have spies in almost all the boards of directors of the largest companies, if they do not pay them a radish ...)
And this is where the scandal broke, with their models and their simulation, they inform each other and the ratings agencies, interact on mortgage rates, will play on key expenses such as rents, rates exchange rates, energy prices, etc.
Conclusion and effects over time:
1) is the description of the temporal effects of the above they can validate their simulations.
2) then they will see THE GLOBAL PLAN: if there are building or not, growth, a decline or no employment, changes of indices of general price level, etc.
3) is then that as far as adjustments have occurred on the labor market, the real impact of measures disappear adjustment variables, and only the negative effect on the general price level will be strengthened
(What they call growing but that is an illusion, because everything is upstream).
This is what 3 point that tickles the neurons and demonstrates the deception. Debt? What debt? Is this really the real issue?
Then the Forex trading values, you know all that, to you to tell me if what I wrote is fitting ...