Rainwater harvesting for domestic use

[crispus]

It’s crazy how ingenious they are to impose "maximum security" on us, at our expense that goes without saying.

An extract edifying by its duplicity:

By way of example, derogations may relate to projects for the use of rainwater for domestic uses in distribution units experiencing difficulties in supplying drinking water proven without alternative solutions, for which have been previously:

- researched all the solutions for the diversification of water resources (example: interconnections, seawater desalination,…);

It is well known that the desalination of seawater is a simple, economical operation and within the reach of any municipality, or even individuals - especially in the mountains

On the other hand, making rainwater potable is perfectly impracticable in the current state of the art: there is much more fuel oil, heavy metals and other pesticides than in seawater. It is therefore wiser to use it. 'prohibit in the name of the precautionary principle.

In short: consumers, continue to enjoy blissfully the choronitrate cocktail distributed by the private company of your choice

[Targol]

Ehhh yes, P'tit Pierrot, we will take the lead of the poor individual who tries, at his level, to recycle (without heavy energy-consuming industrial process) the resources that nature offers him. But besides that, France succeeded in negotiating another postponement of European sanctions for non-compliance with the directive on "the quality of surface water" polluted by nitrates in Brittany.

In short, to summarize, we prohibit the collection of rainwater for domestic use using the excuse of health risks while, on the other hand, we continue to authorize the establishment of industrial pigsties which make water tap unfit for consumption in Brittany.

Welcome to the real world, Neo, you had to take the blue pill ...

[little sparrow]

Bonjour,

I like this remark as much:

It is well known that the desalination of seawater is a simple, economical operation and within the reach of any municipality, or even individuals - especially in the mountains

as much I cannot let that pass:

On the other hand, making rainwater potable is perfectly impracticable in the current state of the art

heuuuu ... tell me ... I hope you don't work at CSHPF at least .. !!!? , because there, this statement is at least 2 wars behind too !!! .....
I would even say that, under certain conditions, it is "easier" to make rainwater drinkable and to obtain "bio-compatible" quality water, than to "purify" city water to have it. the same result ... !!!

it contains much more fuel oil, heavy metals and other pesticides than in seawater

I hope you're kidding there ......


see :
http://ec-eau-logis.over-blog.net/article-5038751.html
and also :
http://ec-eau-logis.over-blog.net/article-6233190.html

cordially

[delnoram]

I hope you're kidding there.

I do not think I am going much to say that yes he is joking, second degree rather caustic towards people who try to put obstacles to dissuade people rather than to lay out and mark the ground with clear information.

[little sparrow]

Hello again ,

I don't think I can go very far by saying that yes he is joking, second degree rather caustic

well i hope ......

but it is:

However,

which intrigues me .... because introduced as it is there .., it does not really seem to bring a joke behind, since it already follows another .....

cordially

[zac]

Hello

well my little sheep continue to respect the laws and the defense of the planet will advance

Stop wasting your energy, peel over texts made to defend total or other vivendi and do what you have to do at home.

obviously you have skills in water treatment; then share your knowledge, damn, instead of force-feeding us with iniquitous laws.

Voila it was my hangover on Sunday.

@+

[little sparrow]

Re,

and do what you have to do at home.

first ..: that's what i do .. !!! so don't worry about me !!

obviously you have skills in water treatment; then share your knowledge, damn,

second ..: this is what i do via my blog ..... !!!!!

and third ... if I feed you with analyzes that no one else has yet done or does not venture to do ..... but nevertheless essential .... well either you do not read it, or you think what you want but you are in no way obliged to criticize and judge those who do something for others and to make things change in a better direction .... !!!!!!!!!



I note once again that I would have done better to refrain from posting this here .......,
definitely ... on this forum it's easier to take it out on the face than to have an encouragement or a positive feedback ... !!!!

bye bye
and forget me especially !!

[zac]

Hello

or not if you have a little piérrot milk soup.

by the way your site it's great

@+

[crispus]

Good evening P'tit Pierrot,

rest assured I support your cause 100% or more ...

Sorry to have expressed myself so badly, I had actually forgotten to specify that for the entire previous post it was:

[caustic mode = on]

The arguments I put forward were of such bad faith that it seemed obvious to me.

Of course, treating rainwater is technically feasible and economically viable ...

Cisterns have been around for a few millennia and are sometimes the only water points in the region. Everyone knew that this water had to be purified before drinking it.

There were of course some poisonings from time to time, but not more than with industrial distribution ...

[Disillusioned mode = on]

The tragedy is that our civilization has lazily abandoned the management of its daily life to "specialists" responsible for its comfort. And now nothing is done to encourage self-care by citizens, on the contrary:

Ignorance promotes consumer dependence, therefore is a factor of economic growth.

[Disillusioned mode = off]

Continue your fight, P'tit Pierrot.

[Misterloxo]

Don't be foolish P'tit Pierrot,

you are welcome here!

Zac's comments were not directly directed against you.

Finally ...

All the same, these aberrant laws ... like an impression that the cracks are tightening ...