remondo hello
hi Janic,
funny argument to ask me if I killed my children to eat ... you realize the excess of your words?
"
Have you, for example, conducted a slaughter your own animals? Same thing for your children as in primitive tribes to feed survival."
It is true that my formulation could be ambiguous, for lack of comma in the right place therefore: "
Have you, for example, conducted a slaughter your own animals? Same thing for your children, like primitive tribes to feed survival Where both adults and children kill their prey to consume them. the second sentence relating to the first: same thing "concerning the slaughter of your own animals". In other words more clearly, I hope, your children kill (like any predator) the animals which they consume? (You don't have to answer me, it's a rhetorical question.)
I am not a hunter nor a fan of bullfighting.
This is simply because they are also categories of persons who kill whether food end, sports, culture and traditions.
I killed rabbits in my youth, and chickens, yes ... after "knocking out". My father took care of the butchering and it was a hell of a discovery of animal anatomy for my childhood eyes
As in many campaigns where it was part of the customs that any affective form is excluded
as soon as possible. But there is a distance between a rabbit and kill an ox! However, as said earlier, this is not the emotional must decide physiology and anatomy. You are an engineer and, as such, you know we can not operate a machine if the product is not suitable. It's the same for organic machine that we are, except that if the case machines, humans respond more technically, but emotionally precisely "
but what did I do to deserve such a thing !!!!? "
Otherwise dépassionnons debate, what you propose to do kill anything living in it without cause your own death?
It does not exist in our system, we are all mortal. All life depends on another life be it an animal or a plant. The carnivorous predator does so by instinct, sometimes by imitation, because Mother Nature has provided for this function: movement, teething, gripper system and retaining its prey, digestive system, etc ... herbivore possesses none of these means: flat teeth, no system to catch and hold prey, lying digestive system, etc ... it feeds on grass, leaves, which do not suppress life may be, any more than the fruit of a tree who used to power such a life form does not destroy the life of it. After: where is the human physiological in this world? This is what decides if such a thing and not another. This is purely technical!
It's fine to criminalize people because they like steak or a carrot ...
The goal is not to criminalize anybody. We are not here or there to decide who is guilty (culture? Habits? Imitation? Food insufficiency? Etc ...) When there was the mad cow crisis, we looked for culprits and it has not found since each party believed to be the best interests of everyone (of course breeders, not the animals that we recall were, until a few months, than just as a furniture chair.) But obviously all knew that cattle are not designed to absorb this type of product whose effects were felt after some time, not immediately.
So we can and must fall term
responsibility in their choices and thus to assume the effects.
Ecology is not that this speech needed to be aware of .... (Of course with arguments that are not only technical and that can help awareness)
One speaker pointed out, moreover, that the technology was there to replace the supposed nature not sufficient for some horrible disease. The question is why and how these pathologies exist and technique (which is only a substitute) Can resolve the issue so far?
Food choices and horrible diseases are mostly related time (for the record, despite much evidence as beri beri, scurvy, Western medicine in long denied the issue by making no dietary courses in medical training. But it changes slowly!) so it is not innocent of what is best for the proper functioning of our organic machine and it starts with knowledge in biology, comparative anatomy, dietetics, nutrition-related diseases, etc ... and therefore preventive measures rather than curative. But it happens evidence, by taking this consciousness ... which is not the case for everyone because, as said GANDHI "
it will not solve the problem of violence in the world and justify this violence to other living beings "(This is a memory citation for meaning, not necessarily the correct word for word)
And I especially like the thought "
It is easier to believe what we are told officially, that venture into intellectual independence ... In fact, this is not the opposition but conformity and inertia that have been most serious obstacles to the awakening of consciousness! »
http://www.evolution-101.com/citations- ... de-gandhi/
And as a bonus this signature / quote from capt maloche: "Consumption is akin to a search for consolation, a way to fill a growing existential void. With, as a result, a lot of frustration and a little guilt, increased by ecological awareness. " (Gérard Mermet) "