Janic wrote: The mistake that many make is to believe that if our French consumption can decrease per person, the question will be improved. However, breeders aim to export and therefore maintain or even increase fodder production.
Hence a necessarily global vision of the problem (Africa will double its population in the coming years and Africans will be demanders as is Asia today) and therefore where will we find what to produce for satisfy these growing populations in terms of numbers and purchasing power?
Yes it is a good remark,
but our eating habits directly influence that of others.For example, we see the success of "fast food" in our country of culinary art, why?
Because the
fast food represents the most dissipative model in energy, it is therefore immediately copied and then reiterated on a large scale, it is therefore imperative to transform our eating habits here for what affect the low.
The export of meat or cereal products only increases ecological problems through a "red queen" type effect.
As for the birth rate of African countries, we are faced with one of the most terrifying problems in history.
Indeed the only way to stop the birth rate and to have recourse to education in order to transform families in a way
r(many children with low education) in one mode
K(few children with a high level of education).
Problem, this type of change occurs only in industrialized countries, apart from the hysteresis of births that it would take several decades - which we no longer have - to limit the number of births.
Similarly, the industrialization of its countries would only amplify the ecocide and increase food problems, thereby favoring migratory movements, conflicts and famines ... the situation is overwhelming.
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.