I do not know the price of the EPR that will not be seeded but from a mass production.
109 MWh is a Hinkley seeded price point is an EPR but that will still be modified from those Taishan Flamanville or Finland.
In this series will be a little less, but how much?
Photo yes to 70 but sold in the best case yet in Cestas over 100.
And the in-batted in particular is 200 I think.
Then at that price remains filled with the intermittent storage or other means of production.
How much is the intermittency management cost?
I do not think that the proliferation suffice unless you have to superconducting power lines or it must be demonstrated to me.
Wind power in 40? It is rather around 50 but it probably continura to decreased a little with the economies of scale (larger machines).
http://www.enr.fr/userfiles/files/Broch ... e%20VF.pdf
It still remains intermittently supplemented at what price?
The former nuclear non rafistollé not be pushed either, it will be between 55 and 60 but not intermittent.
Hydropower is good but the supply is intermittent and too variable from one year to another. The difference is that storage is quite simple part.
25 GW of installed power but "only" 75 TWh per year in the best case (14% of annual consumption).
With the stress of a production more in spring than in winter (snow melt). So clogged intermittency without STEP is not possible.
The STEP is a yield of 70%, a need for a stream in the case of mountain STEP (evaporation compensation by the principle of the saturated vapor pressure) and flooded surfaces. It is still the only current means capable of stored huge amounts of energy.
The future of this STEP is perhaps the seaside STEP. Provided it is possible (bazaar Civens example).
https://www.edf.fr/sites/default/files/ ... 014_VF.pdf
P118 hydraulic producible EDF (20GW on 25GW).
The wind does not forget that the power is proportional to the cube of speed. But it is always more constant than the sun that can potentially produce max 10% power solar midday to peak when it rains (diffuse radiation).
All that to say yes I want renewable, but I also want a price, taking into account storage for a real price.
Yes I am ready to have even more expensive renewable sources in other circumstances they are not used to rent some financial.
And yes it is absurd to build new nuclear power in the state (not fission fusion) because the withdrawal will be even longer.
High prices encourage the négawatts, low price of the waste. The solution requires the rate increase?
I do not know many people willing to invest without a return on investment.
The energy market will be as long as there pipé grant a means of production whatsoever. But if that EDF withdraws part of the market the current price will rise is mechanical.
Shortage = high prices
But in this case we forget immediately the idea of public service also.
It will enable new players started to produce (few do) and not just bought, resell, cashed the difference.
15 KWp at 200E per MWh no thank you I still prefer a power station like Cestas at "only" 100E per MWh
Good afternoon