The wacky assumption that could change the world

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
The Passing
x 17

The wacky assumption that could change the world




by The Passing » 15/12/05, 19:53

Courrier International n ° 789 page 52 wrote: PHYSICAL ? A researcher claims to have discovered a new source of energy. But his highly contested works contradict all quantum physics.


(If this extract from the Courrier International newspaper poses a problem of reproduction rights, let me know, I will delete it immediately).

What is described in the article could explain the excess heat observed in Naudin's cold fusion experiments (it is only mine) :)

Main site link: http://www.blacklightpower.com/
The Hydrino on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrino

the subject still seems controversial:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/webl ... ents/3751/
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/foru ... hread/499/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story ... 24,00.html

The thing that bothers me is that one of the directors of Blacklight Power is a certain Michael H Jordan .... also boss of EDS: http://www.eds.com/about/board/ (the box I work for) : Shock:
Last edited by The Passing the 15 / 12 / 05, 20: 44, 2 edited once.
0 x
User avatar
nonoLeRobot
Master Kyot'Home
Master Kyot'Home
posts: 790
Registration: 19/01/05, 23:55
Location: Beaune 21 / Paris
x 13




by nonoLeRobot » 15/12/05, 20:37

Very interesting, but it's funny, by himself he doesn't really know what's going on and he's already planning the production date of his heating system.

It's funny too, Gifnet's more efficient heating system was also with a history of hydrogen dissociation there may be a common cause.

If it is really efficient, we may be able to run stirling engines with the heat given off.
0 x
Bibiphoque
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 749
Registration: 31/03/04, 07:37
Location: Brussels




by Bibiphoque » 13/01/06, 08:24

Hi, Benoit,
About futura science : Evil: , they said it was anything, but "they" do not know what it is because nothing has been given to invalidate this hypothesis, it may be very real. And this is an area where few people can understand or explain everything.
@+ : Shock:
0 x
This is not because we always said that it is impossible that we should not try :)
The Passing
x 17




by The Passing » 13/01/06, 08:32

Yes, I had started a discussion on futura-science in parallel indeed, knowing that the people there are "very eminent scientists" and especially to have an additional opinion :)

Link: here.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 13/01/06, 08:53

Hello,

Read today in this month's International Mail page 52

### url removed by moderation: please do not distribute non-copyright-free documents ####


What I like is their impartiality .... since when URLs are subject to copyright ...

The guys from futura sciences are indeed in the same state of thought as the inquisitors of Galilee. :x
0 x
The Passing
x 17




by The Passing » 13/01/06, 08:57

Econology wrote:Hello,

Read today in this month's International Mail page 52

### url removed by moderation: please do not distribute non-copyright-free documents ####


What I like is their impartiality .... since when URLs are subject to copyright ...

The guys from futura sciences are indeed in the same state of thought as the inquisitors of Galilee. :x


Indeed, I found that they had very high self-esteem. In any case I am subscribed to Courrier International, and I do not think that the (limited) distribution of a single page poses a problem. (I make the parallel with with a page of this newspaper taped on a bulletin board in the hall of a university for example, it is not illegal :) )
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 13/01/06, 09:00

Well if you put that Url ... there is NO problem ... it's anything that excuse ... after if you copied / pasted the article it's another thing ...

Besides, could you give us the url here please?
Last edited by Christophe the 13 / 01 / 06, 09: 06, 1 edited once.
0 x
Rulian
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 686
Registration: 02/02/04, 19:46
Location: Caen




by Rulian » 13/01/06, 09:03

The thing is interesting. I may be wary as much as possible of this kind of "miracle" energy, I must admit that the battle of experts seems credible because of the positions occupied by the belligerents.

I am waiting to see. If it comes out their heating, you have an econo-product of the fire of God, Christophe : Mrgreen:

But it is true that at the theoretical level, it does not stick too much with the little I know of atom models, which are still quite powerful.

And the remaining hydrinos, what do we do with it ???
0 x
The Passing
x 17




by The Passing » 13/01/06, 09:05

- Link to the Courrier International article: here
- Link of the 52 page, "taped and placarded" on the econology bulletin board :)
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 13/01/06, 09:09

I like the intro: "contradict quantum physics" It is inflated to say that when you know that each great physicist (Heisenberg, Shrödinger, Planck ...) has a different quantum theory ...

I quote :

Quantum physics is known to be counter-intuitive, to shock "common sense" and to require arduous mathematical formalism. Feynman, one of the greatest theoretical theorists in quantum physics in the second half of the XNUMXth century, wrote:
“No one really understands quantum physics. "

The main reason for these difficulties is that the world of the infinitely small behaves very differently from the macroscopic environment to which we are accustomed. Some fundamental differences that separate these two worlds are for example:


The following : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physique_quantique
0 x

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 266 guests