Grandstand to sign on peak oil

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...

Should the Peak Oil be an important subject of the presidential campaign?

You can select 1 option

 
 
Consult the results
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16097
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5232

Grandstand to sign on peak oil




by Remundo » 02/04/12, 11:27

Hello to Econologues,

I don't usually ask to sign public calls, but this one is so important that I submit it for your consideration.

Mobilizing society in the face of peak oil

After more than a century of significant increase in oil production and consumption, the Earth is running out of steam and the notion of a “peak in production”, once ignored, has become an inevitable reality. This tension is already manifested through the deployment of extraction techniques requiring ever more investment, energy and materials.

[]

The urgency therefore appears to anticipate an inexorable energy descent. Physical limits should trigger a real transition in society towards a major decrease in our dependence on non-renewable resources, by a profound change in behavior, the organization of the territory and our economy. If this transition is not anticipated, it will be chaotic and will have disastrous economic consequences., like the subprime crisis. The foundations of democracy and peace could therefore be threatened.

In this context, it is essential that politicians, but also all social and economic actors as well as French citizens, become aware of this issue and show anticipation, because we are facing a real danger for social cohesion and the functioning of all the vital sectors of our community.


This call was written by people fully informed on the subject including: Jean Marc Jancovici, Jean Laherrere de REEL and several shoe sizes having worked for the big oil groups.

This is not an alarmist media blow, but a major problem that you have to admit and then draw conclusions quickly.

More information and possibility to sign:
Grandstand on the Peak Oil
0 x
Image
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79295
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11028




by Christophe » 02/04/12, 11:57

Good initiative but to make it the front page of the news or a special evening in prime time on TF1 or FR2 would certainly be more effective ...



: Idea: : Idea:
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16097
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5232




by Remundo » 02/04/12, 12:04

Happy Christophe :P

Call them so ... Between 2 American series and 15 min of advertising, it could pass : Mrgreen:
0 x
Image
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79295
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11028




by Christophe » 02/04/12, 12:08

They are well aware but you know well who (or rather what) controls the economic world ... when there is no solution, the best is still not to talk about it ... it is the current technique of policies regarding oil depletion ... (just like other depletions elsewhere: metals in 1st ...)

Watch or review this 50-minute documentary: https://www.econologie.info/index.php/?2 ... terrorisme

What bothers me is that there are solutions, at least for petroleum ... example: https://www.econologie.com/forums/microalgue ... 10514.html

Only here: 40 $ (with cost price say 20 $) + tax is less good than 120 $ (with the same cost price) + tax for those who are on the cash drawer side ...

Consume, consume, be happy ... :| :|
0 x
User avatar
Did67
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 20362
Registration: 20/01/08, 16:34
Location: Alsace
x 8685




by Did67 » 02/04/12, 14:03

Christophe wrote:They are well aware but you know well who (or rather what) controls the economic world ... when there is no solution, the best is still not to talk about it ... it is the current technique of policies with regard to oil depletion ... (just like the other depletions elsewhere: metals in 1st ...): |


The rant, come on, let's say the call of Nicolas Hulot on the news of 20 pm of France2 (sequence known as "20:30 pm on Sunday evening") was clearly going in this direction!
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 02/04/12, 15:00

Absolutely Remundo, peak oil is THE subject to be treated.

All the others are only details, because without energy it is the end of our civilization, except, given our "petro-dependence" and given the geopolitical situation in the Middle East coupled with the material limits of the reserves, we can say that we are at the dawn of a new era (or war?).
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79295
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11028




by Christophe » 02/04/12, 18:35

Did67 wrote:The rant, come on, let's say the call of Nicolas Hulot on the news of 20 pm of France2 (sequence known as "20:30 pm on Sunday evening") was clearly going in this direction!


Uh it dates from when it tells me nothing, we talk about it on econo? : Idea: :?:
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 02/04/12, 19:25

Peak oil, almost imaginary, in fact, is much less important than the future Fukushima in France inevitable sooner or later, humans cannot be infallible in perpetuity , with radioactive waste, which we bequeath to our grandchildren for tens of millennia, madness !!

Then comes the explosion of CO2, gas, coal, even without petroleum , which we bequeath to our grandchildren and descendants for the next millennium, since the sea level in balance with the current concentration of CO2, is 20m higher !!!

Jancovici dreams of a radioactive peak on the whole earth at 200mSieverts / year not documented, so without danger, according to him, in his video yards !!
with Fukushima everywhere !!!

With the vastness of our neglected and developable technological possibilities, we can do without oil and better use solar energy, with suffering, but with the same technological civilization.
See www.dlsc.ca neglected with immense possibilities to store solar heat over a year, current solar defect !!
Those who do not understand it are antiecological, because all the objections are only superficial, infinitely easier to resolve than those on nuclear.
Last edited by dedeleco the 02 / 04 / 12, 19: 31, 1 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79295
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11028




by Christophe » 02/04/12, 19:27

Calm down with the big characters in bold please, I have moderated ...
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16097
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5232




by Remundo » 02/04/12, 20:02

Yes Dede, it's true, Jancovici is too nuclear for my taste and solar is a big part of the solution; this does not detract from his diagnosis on the peak which is one of the best in France.

@ Christophe
For Nicolas Hulot's rant, it is available on the Journal at 20 p.m.
Sunday April 1, 2012
from 33min40
http://jt.france2.fr/20h/

He asked certain things with conviction and relevance, that's for sure.

Without wanting to criticize Eva Joly, I think he would have made a better candidate for the Greens.
0 x
Image

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 226 guests