published: 17/11/04, 00:19
Salutations to all !
I already posted this message on the forum PMC, but it was blocked for a week, and I just discovered this forum Quanthomme ...
I have not yet produced anything concrete on this forum that I have been with interest for a long time.
I am one of the "silent participants" and like them, I usually speak only when I have things to say?
This is the case today, I just put in the file section of the forum PMC a Pdf called Pantone Reactor Assessment Project.pdf.
This is the result of my cogitations, nourished by hours of reading in this forum and elsewhere, from my own experiences in research and development in industrial electronics (even if it has not been my activity lately?).
Reading your messages confirms the validity of these reflections.
Unfortunately, my main and priority activity, for now, is music! And I'm frustrated at not being able to experiment, however, I have ideas and suggestions to bring to the group.
I read passionately the debate that Christophe started, with his pavement in the pond. Especially since at this precise moment, I was at a point of my reflections on the development of a Pantone test bench where it seemed obvious to me that such work required that we seriously reflect on our way of cooperate in fact.
We each have skills, whatever they are. And that's good, since this project is multidisciplinary. Everyone can find their place. And paf, Christophe balances his letter? So I fully agree with the idea that we are organizing. Especially since this project fits perfectly with the idea of joining forces. To be concrete, here is the type of organization that we could set up:
As for the framework, I will favor the association law 1901. It is not expensive, you can have a bank account (mainly supplemented by membership fees and donations). The purpose of this association would be, for example, to reduce waste and pollution, and the consumption of fossil fuels. Its main mission would be to manage a website open to members, providing them with all the facilities for accessing documents, making contributions (skills, material, financial, logistics?), And organizing work.
We must indeed take into account the fact that we are scattered all over France, and even further (not true Quebecers? J)
Groups must therefore be organized by region, if possible not too far apart.
That said, the problem does not arise either for the material or for the money which are transported very well.
Theoretically, an association can ask for subsidies, but I believe that in our case, it is not even worth thinking about it. Everything will be done on our own funds (it is the guarantee of our independence?)
To go a step further in concrete terms, I would even say that a guy like Christophe, a young engineer who has already carried out a test bench, with a priori many of the necessary skills, plus the ouach, could very well be supported financially by a scholarship system, and logistically, with all the necessary equipment to send him to his lab, to allow him to conduct the manipulation, solicit help from PMCists, and move forward for god's sake, move on!
Well, I'm getting carried away, but I think that, given our means, which are not those of the multinationals, it would be good to save us the reinvention of the wheel, and to designate certain people to work on this or that part of the device. .
If we want to make a test bench, we will have to centralize all of this at some point. The parts may well be manufactured by So-and-so who can weld stainless steel, than in Telautre who provides the handling management program, etc. But in the end, all of this will have to be put together with someone, with a minimum of knowledge, surrounded if necessary by other people from the group to start up the manipulations.
I took the example of Christophe, but I think he is not the only eligible candidate, fortunately (this forum is rich, I tell you!).
I would be happy to read your reactions to this message.
My real name is Michel Lathuraz, but in the forum, I use another one so as not to be bombarded with spam?
Good cogitations, friendly,
Michel
I already posted this message on the forum PMC, but it was blocked for a week, and I just discovered this forum Quanthomme ...
I have not yet produced anything concrete on this forum that I have been with interest for a long time.
I am one of the "silent participants" and like them, I usually speak only when I have things to say?
This is the case today, I just put in the file section of the forum PMC a Pdf called Pantone Reactor Assessment Project.pdf.
This is the result of my cogitations, nourished by hours of reading in this forum and elsewhere, from my own experiences in research and development in industrial electronics (even if it has not been my activity lately?).
Reading your messages confirms the validity of these reflections.
Unfortunately, my main and priority activity, for now, is music! And I'm frustrated at not being able to experiment, however, I have ideas and suggestions to bring to the group.
I read passionately the debate that Christophe started, with his pavement in the pond. Especially since at this precise moment, I was at a point of my reflections on the development of a Pantone test bench where it seemed obvious to me that such work required that we seriously reflect on our way of cooperate in fact.
We each have skills, whatever they are. And that's good, since this project is multidisciplinary. Everyone can find their place. And paf, Christophe balances his letter? So I fully agree with the idea that we are organizing. Especially since this project fits perfectly with the idea of joining forces. To be concrete, here is the type of organization that we could set up:
As for the framework, I will favor the association law 1901. It is not expensive, you can have a bank account (mainly supplemented by membership fees and donations). The purpose of this association would be, for example, to reduce waste and pollution, and the consumption of fossil fuels. Its main mission would be to manage a website open to members, providing them with all the facilities for accessing documents, making contributions (skills, material, financial, logistics?), And organizing work.
We must indeed take into account the fact that we are scattered all over France, and even further (not true Quebecers? J)
Groups must therefore be organized by region, if possible not too far apart.
That said, the problem does not arise either for the material or for the money which are transported very well.
Theoretically, an association can ask for subsidies, but I believe that in our case, it is not even worth thinking about it. Everything will be done on our own funds (it is the guarantee of our independence?)
To go a step further in concrete terms, I would even say that a guy like Christophe, a young engineer who has already carried out a test bench, with a priori many of the necessary skills, plus the ouach, could very well be supported financially by a scholarship system, and logistically, with all the necessary equipment to send him to his lab, to allow him to conduct the manipulation, solicit help from PMCists, and move forward for god's sake, move on!
Well, I'm getting carried away, but I think that, given our means, which are not those of the multinationals, it would be good to save us the reinvention of the wheel, and to designate certain people to work on this or that part of the device. .
If we want to make a test bench, we will have to centralize all of this at some point. The parts may well be manufactured by So-and-so who can weld stainless steel, than in Telautre who provides the handling management program, etc. But in the end, all of this will have to be put together with someone, with a minimum of knowledge, surrounded if necessary by other people from the group to start up the manipulations.
I took the example of Christophe, but I think he is not the only eligible candidate, fortunately (this forum is rich, I tell you!).
I would be happy to read your reactions to this message.
My real name is Michel Lathuraz, but in the forum, I use another one so as not to be bombarded with spam?
Good cogitations, friendly,
Michel