Obamot wrote:If it were to happen, it would be a shame!
Fire someone who defends a scientific approach! It would be really very big, even for someone who does not sometimes show himself to be very diplomatic, when he does not make us laugh well with his sense of distributed.
You've already admitted that you were a "driving force" behind the ouster of Dedeleco, who also defended the scientific approach against all odds (I don't defend it, I see). If it were to happen again, I think it could do a fatal blow to the credibility of this forum! Lessdewatt has the right to say that he does not agree, especially since he has given technical arguments which seem unstoppable, since those opposite try hard not to answer! This is what is unacceptable: this contempt for criticism! This contempt which hampers all progress is called resistance to change. Difficult to do worse. I was entitled to the same regime by making suggestions which were far from being aggressive: same denial, same arrogance! And no personal attack, since I did this by MP. But no response!
Finally I wonder if you are not the sorcerer! Because you have already realized the enormities debited in these threads (thanks to your technical background) and you say nothing ... You first took it out on me at the time of Dede, and finally change your rifle. You're still a pretty ambiguous guy ... Almost as much as my apple when I try not to take a stand! But there I have trouble. I believe that responding with humor is not detrimental, since all the other solutions have failed to get a message across. There is therefore no reason.
If I didn't have you at the right one, I would say that it's you who must put in the fridge my big Mebon, putting a Canadian in the fridge is like putting a fish in water ^^
Either you do not see clearly in the game of moinnsdewatt or you have a big bias!
What can we say to critics who do not experiment?
Don't tell me you don't take sides!