Autonomous chalet and "supernumerary" motor on FR3

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 27/11/12, 22:11

Look for the mistake in the title, to see here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xhpd7g ... dre_webcam

Obelix · by **Obelix** » 27/11/12, 22:57

Hello,
This is the most beautiful scam ever mounted in France!
FA is a very nice vacuum cleaner galore and especially grants ....
Nothing that it shows really works Hatem, Kapanadze, and touti quanti .....

Obelix

Mathew · by **Mathew** » 27/11/12, 22:58

I'm not going to say what I think about Fabrice André, but for having spoken to him on the phone and having seen it in real life at the Mérindol meetings, I think it's a ...., ...., ....., ..... and so on.

And his supernumerary engine, he's nice, but we do not see him working. Just as at the Mérindol meetings in 2011, he did not show anything at the conference.

As long as he can live on his salads .... (the real ones, the ones that grow up when we feed and maintain them : Mrgreen:

)

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 27/11/12, 23:25

I think we have the same opinion ... but what is serious in this case is that journalists relay it ... and France3 is not a small channel ... or so it was broadcast a 1er April ???

: Cheesy:

BobFuck · by **BobFuck** » 28/11/12, 00:02

Ah, him. The famous enculuminated breeder of shadocks. What a clown.

Janic · by **Janic** » 28/11/12, 09:13

The video date! What would be interesting is to know what it is today.
Skeptics have done more to prevent innovations than to promote them.

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 28/11/12, 09:29

Janic wrote:The video date! What would be interesting is to know what it is today.

Yes that's it! Since we discovered the Higgs boson physics behaves differently ... : Mrgreen:

ps: I'm talking about physics "in nature" not the scientific world ...

Did67 · by **Did67** » 28/11/12, 11:23

1) I do not know if it was an 1re April ...

2) When you know a subject well, it is not uncommon to note very approximate approximations made by journalists, also in the race to the sensational for reasons of audience!

3) That said, let us recognize that it is difficult to achieve the big gap between "to interest as many people as possible", "to be exact", "to be understandable by a tired person", therefore "to simplify" ... The televisual pedagogy is an art ... No artist is willing!

) For a long time, in the newspapers, we saw "SEEN on TV" in the pubs. In subliminal, it is therefore "proven" ... It is becoming rarer, I find. Why ??? No one believes what is being said on TV anymore ???

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 28/11/12, 12:59

Lol yes at the moment it's more the reverse argument that works: "Not seen on TV" ... lol

moinsdewatt · by **moinsdewatt** » 28/11/12, 19:28

Ha Ha Fabrice André, I met him last year on the sidelines of the green event at the Albenc.

He had exhibited his supernumerary '' trick '' in a garage on the road leading to the Albenc fair.
It almost ended badly because I came back to him verbally. Stronger and stronger.

It was the person who owned the garage that ended the discussion.

Fabrice André is a moron who does not understand anything about electricity, especially the phase between voltage and current.

Join an algorithmic censorship-free community of enthusiasts, technicians, scientists or engineers. Ads removed after registration.

Autonomous chalet and "supernumerary" motor on FR3