Monsanto: Willingness to control global food

Agriculture and soil. Pollution control, soil remediation, humus and new agricultural techniques.
User avatar
bham
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1666
Registration: 20/12/04, 17:36
x 6

Monsanto: Willingness to control global food




by bham » 20/04/07, 17:07

After the video of Special Envoy of 19-04-2007 on GMOs, here is another video on Monsanto's desire to patent (natural) pork genes: staggering !!!!
Alsatian charcuterie has problems to do : Cheesy:
see it :

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x19vum ... rc-14_news

But who will stop them ??
0 x
User avatar
zac
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 1446
Registration: 06/05/05, 20:31
Location: piton st leu
x 2

Re: monsanto: desire to control world food




by zac » 20/04/07, 19:00

bham wrote:Alsatian charcuterie has problems to do : Cheesy:

But who will stop them ??


1) do charcuterie in Alsace?

2) People who don't eat it. the boycott is good : Mrgreen:

@+
0 x
Said the zebra, freeman (endangered breed)
This is not because I am con I try not to do smart things.
User avatar
bham
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1666
Registration: 20/12/04, 17:36
x 6

Re: monsanto: desire to control world food




by bham » 20/04/07, 22:04

zac wrote:
1) do charcuterie in Alsace?

Well yo! and sauerkraut then it's not just cabbage! it was of course a nod to Christophe, but I could also have talked about Brittany.

zac wrote: 2) People who don't eat it. the boycott is good : Mrgreen: @+

it will not be enough to put them on the ground, unless you are vegetarian, Muslim or Jewish.

In the meantime, let's boycott the Round Up!
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6979
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2904

Re: monsanto: desire to control world food




by gegyx » 20/04/07, 22:18

bham wrote:In the meantime, let's boycott the Round Up!

A Ketchup sub-brand?
Firm "MonSatan"
: Lol:
0 x
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 21/04/07, 05:43

Hello
Received in my email

Hello
Last night there was a report on the Monsanto company.
She wants to take global control of food by
adding GMOs into their seeds or directly into
the animal. >>>>>> Well here is another example of what we want
make us eat. >>>>>> Happy reading¸




Subject: FW: KFC
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN (PFK) is part of the tradition
North American for many years.
eat religiously several times a week. But
do they know what they really eat?
A recent study by the University of New Hampshire has
discovered some really disturbing facts.
First, have you noticed that the company recently changed its name? Kentucky Fried Chicken is now called PFK. We asked ourselves why?
At the start, we thought that the word 'Fried' being a guarantee of fried food
(bad for health) the management had decided to eliminate it.
But it was not the right answer. The reason why the
company is now called PFK, it's because it's
now forbidden to use the word 'chicken'. Why? Because
PFK no longer uses real chicken. They are now using
genetically engineered organisms.
These things, which we will call 'chicken' anyway, are kept alive by means of tubes inserted into their bodies. The tubes pump blood and nutritious food through the body of these artificial animals. They have neither beak, nor feathers, nor
paws. Their bone mass is reduced to its strict minimum for
add more meat per chicken. It's very profitable for
PFK, because 'chickens' raised in this way cost a lot
cheaper to process than normal chickens: they don't have to be plucked and their beaks and legs removed. The United States government (where PFK is headquartered) has demanded that the
company stops using the word chicken.
Indeed, if you look carefully in their menu, the word is no longer there. Also listen to their sales representatives. I can guarantee that you will not hear or see the word chicken. Please send this message to your relatives and friends so that they
become aware of the situation hoping that the decline in
sales will force PFK to either use real chicken again or
disappear from the face of the world.

Enjoy your meal !!!
0 x
User avatar
bham
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1666
Registration: 20/12/04, 17:36
x 6




by bham » 21/04/07, 07:52

Andre wrote: ..... PFK no longer uses real chicken. They are now using genetically engineered organisms.
These things, which we will call 'chicken' anyway, are kept alive by means of tubes inserted into their bodies. The tubes pump blood and nutritious food through the body of these artificial animals. They have neither beak, nor feathers, nor
paws. Their bone mass is reduced to its strict minimum for
add more meat per chicken. It's very profitable for
PFK, because 'chickens' raised in this way cost a lot
cheaper to process than normal chickens: we do not have to pluck them or remove their beaks and legs.


Maybe that doesn't mean anything to you André, but Louis de Funès was playing in a film "the wing or the thigh" and it was almost what you describe, the making of an infamous artificial food. So that's it, here we are, from science fiction to reality. What a crazy world! the human species is decidedly irrecoverable! : Shock:
0 x
User avatar
bham
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1666
Registration: 20/12/04, 17:36
x 6




by bham » 21/04/07, 08:58

Andre wrote: ..... PFK no longer uses real chicken. They are now using genetically engineered organisms.
These things, which we will call 'chicken' anyway, are kept alive by means of tubes inserted into their bodies. The tubes pump blood and nutritious food through the body of these artificial animals. They have neither beak, nor feathers, nor
paws. Their bone mass is reduced to its strict minimum for
add more meat per chicken. It's very profitable for
PFK, because 'chickens' raised in this way cost a lot
cheaper to process than normal chickens: we do not have to pluck them or remove their beaks and legs.

Uh André, are you sure of your source? after reflection, it was so big that I wanted to check it out and this is what I find:
http://www.lepoulet.qc.ca/infopoulet/pfk.php and that :
http://www.lepoulet.qc.ca/mythes/ where we see chickens in feathers and beak and legs, in freedom moreover and not in cage. So INTOX?
If you have more info, I'm interested.
0 x
User avatar
zac
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 1446
Registration: 06/05/05, 20:31
Location: piton st leu
x 2

Re: monsanto: desire to control world food




by zac » 21/04/07, 16:48

bham wrote:
zac wrote:
1) do charcuterie in Alsace?

Well yo! and sauerkraut then it's not just cabbage!
zac wrote: 2) People who don't eat it. the boycott is good : Mrgreen: @+


Well, don't confuse cold meats and pork.
so just eat charcuterie and not pork.
Between a REAL andouille sausage and a frankfurter (you know the stuff full of flour of undetermined origin wrapped in plastic) is still a difference.

@+
0 x
Said the zebra, freeman (endangered breed)

This is not because I am con I try not to do smart things.
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 21/04/07, 17:13

Hello
Uh André, are you sure of your source? after reflection, it was so big that I wanted to check it out and this is what I find:


No guarantee on the source, it happened in my E-mail,
There is a fried chicken seller kentucky colonel Sander, 800 meters from my house I sometimes buy pots of broken down chicken it is true that the bones are small, but from there, it is rare that I buy there, in principle the best chicken restaurant is St-Hubert BBQ, but currently we no longer know what we eat, even the salad seeds from the garden are questionable, unless we do it ourselves ...
As my friend would say, one day you have to die of something.
Appropriate of profit of $, the rich will eat organic the poor eat GMOs they will not live old will be more productive on the job market, it will not cost a short short time, if they go there and their children will be working, we will provide them with beer and cigarettes, this will end their career faster, a beautiful company of multinationals.

Andre
0 x
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7




by elephant » 21/04/07, 22:55

André said:

$ Profit scum, the rich will eat organic the poor eat GMOs they will not live old will be more productive on the job market, they will not cost a short retirement, if they go there and they will make their children work, we will provide them with beer and cigarettes, this will end their career faster, a beautiful company of multinationals


You understood everything, it looks like.

When at the end of the 65th or at the beginning of the XNUMXth century the German Reichstag was reluctant to set the pension age at XNUMX and to pass the law, Bismarck said to them: "Come on, gentlemen, at that age there is no 'there will not be many who will be able to benefit from it. Things have changed a lot since then, I would even say that in our civilized countries, we have the opposite problem, despite the hormone chicken, despite the GMO corn ...
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 204 guests