That Toff, I created this topic
It's been a while since I try myself to cleaning up the dirty fuel that is diesel
At first, I attacked on an oil burner to understand and reduce pollution from burning oil HERE: heating-insulation / amelioration-burner-fuel-reduction-nox-and-co-Blue Flame-t5172.html and the result was a reduction of a factor 20 pollution (Soot, NOx and CO), I let you read
then the idea came to me to "visualize" the emissions from the exhaust of my new company car, in order to "see" the unburnt product specific to the combustion in 1 cycle of the GO see HERE: eat-less-auto / fuel economies de-grace-al-acetone-t1151-120.html # p78720
I mounted on the muffler a 30x30cm cotton cloth fixed with a serflex to "see" what I reject with the first mixture at 10%
Mount 30sesondes
I'll let you read the following pages 4 the subject, if for info and to readCapt_Maloche wrote:Here is the last "sample" made this morning with "normal" GO on the same 25km work route, under the same conditions
FROM THE MOST CRADE TO THE "CLEAN"
Demonstration is made that the addition of a more "volatile" or explosive fuel allows better combustion
Left to do these tests:
- See recycled gas heating-insulation / amelioration-burner-fuel-reduction-nox-and-co-Blue Flame-t5172-60.html # p81989
- Steam injection
The most formidable of all, is that for my company Clio 1.5DCI 70Cv 2008 1200Kg, power consumption fell to 4.6 L / 100 Paris route, highway, + AC, mixed while my colleagues are 6.2 L / 100
and my Espace IV DCI 2.2Cv 150 from 2004 1850kg happened below the 6.7L / 100 on a jam-60Km / h average (according to the onboard computer), plug the builder displays 7.7 L / 100 I always struggled to achieve
In the first case, the car is new 8500 Km, I first did a test 10% of SP95 and to 6%
For the space I used at the beginning of the year a remettalisant (Métal5) and a cleaning injection circuit and I made full with 2 5% of SP95 is on the full aujourd 'hui I found this real consumption 6.7 L / 100 while the trip computer displays 7.3 L / 100, surprising, and this difference is most striking about this right.
Certainly I drive using the vehicle's inertia, slightly overinflated tires, filters relatively clean, but I did not train me
I EXPECT YOUR TESTS AND COMPARATIVE FOLLOWING
Ciao, this time I take to the mountain
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Finally after months of trial and 16 000 km covered
we can say without too much deceive us that: See here
the addition of at 7 10% of SP95 in GO enables:
- Better combustion, (less CO)
- A reduction of unburned (less particulate)
- Fuel savings of around 5% (due to better combustion)
- A rise in faster engine speed (burning a little faster)
- Impeccable starts, even -16 ° C