2008 balance sheet forums Econology?

[Christophe]

I know it's a little late but on the occasion of the traditional vows I would like to make a small assessment of what the forums allowed to make concrete this year. Obviously it is impossible to know all the achievements that we allowed them forums because a lot of things are done without even the director registering, let alone publishing.

Here are the things that come to my mind "cold" without doing any research:

a) doping with Maloche boiler water (which could be called the Maloche process?):
- news : https://www.econologie.com/une-chaudiere ... -3830.html
- forum :
https://www.econologie.com/forums/ameliorati ... t5172.html

b) my hydraulic ram:
- news : https://www.econologie.com/pompage-par-b ... -3835.html
- forum :
https://www.econologie.com/forums/belier-hyd ... t5268.html

c) launch of the "dawn project":
- forum : https://www.econologie.com/forums/tambour-de ... t6303.html

I think that a dozen "subjects" will be sufficient, largely. thank you for completing (Remundo in particular?)

[Christophe]

I think that the follow-up of household waste of A2E also has its place among this "2008 report": https://www.econologie.com/suivi-du-volu ... -4008.html

[C moa]

Ben and Laigret then ???

Did you forget Laigret ??

I do not believe it !!!

Okay, we are far from finished but still, we are on the right track for now !!!

[Christophe]

It was to see if you followed

But for the moment, you will admit, that there is not too much concrete on Laigret ... even if we are making serious progress!

So ok I add it to the list! That's 5!

[Elec]

Very concretely, this forum is nice.
But what I find unfortunate about this forumis the absence of serious debates on bio-agrofuels. I have the impression that this is a somewhat taboo subject ... Am I mistaken? ;)

[Christophe]

Lack of debate? If there's something missing on the forums That's right...

Use the search engine: you will see that this has been widely and seriously discussed. Here for example: https://www.econologie.com/valorisation- ... -2985.html
Now the CNAM may not be serious enough for you ...

There are lots of files in downloads from very serious organizations: https://www.econologie.com/biocarburants ... -3503.html

ps: thank you for not trolling ... we know your position on biofuels ...

[Elec]

I have consulted all the archives of the site and forum about bio-agrofuels. Sorry to be demanding;)

[Christophe]

I don't believe you ... the CNAM conference is very complete for example:
https://www.econologie.com/video-confere ... -2991.html

Anyway your remark is irrelevant ...

If you want to launch a serious debate and make a summary: free to you but please less bias towards the 100% electric car ...

[Elec]

I don't believe you ... the CNAM conference is very complete for example:
https://www.econologie.com/video-confere ... -2991.html

Anyway your remark is irrelevant ...

If you want to launch a serious debate and make a summary: free to you but please less bias towards the 100% electric car ...

Christophe, you cannot accuse me of bias: you know what I wrote and published on Jatropha curcas et on algae oil fuels. This paper on algo-fuels (2005), which serves as a reference on the thread in question, is superficial, as superficial as the majority of the papers on this subject and cited on this site. For cellulosic ethanol, it's even worse.

And on the other hand you cannot qualify as partial the summary report of Jacobson: there is nothing more complete / global on the subject. However, to ignore the conclusions of this type of report is to show partiality. I find this unfortunate, and I wanted to tell you. I stop on this subject on this thread, I said what I had to say.

[Christophe]

Well yes it is all the same strange but it seems to me that you have become it all the same!

You only swear by 100% electric propulsion while others, pros, show that it is not so much cleaner on gray energy than petrol propulsion ...

The Electric solution + offshore source of renewable energy I like very much but it has its limits ... Limits which could be pushed back by certain biofuels: the best.

Do not you think?

The fact is that currently, by lobbying in particular, we exploit the worst biofuels industrially ... (don't tell me: it's better than nothing and it's a novelty because before WWII we produced per year in France, more energy ethanol than in 2) ...

ps: I said partial and not partial ...