You suppose well!Bolt wrote:[...] (here to continue, it must be assumed that the engine in question does not lack air (partly replaced by steam)) [...]
Indeed, given the boost pressures applied, we can consider that the engine does not lack air.
The WRCs in 2005 configuration are not necessarily more efficient than those in 2006 configuration, as we can see on the heats of the World Cup, even if the very good performances of Dani Sordo for example could possibly be explained by this "evolution gap "...zac wrote:[...] Here in A8 the cars are more efficient than that of loeb, [...]
Econology wrote:Bolt wrote: I'm sure even christophe in person can't follow
Bolt wrote:To see their 12 liters of water tank, for how long they had, knowing that they only used it at times (how long in% according to you, econology)
It can go much higher for certain "critical" Grand Prix like Monza for example where there, the time of full load (accelerator at bottom) can reach 70% of the total time.Econology wrote:Bolt wrote:To see their 12 liters of water tank, for how long they had, knowing that they only used it at times (how long in% according to you, econology)
1) According to an old memory of an engine course, the average load of an F1 during a GP is between 35 and 40% (if Bucheron has more precise figures ... I agree) over the duration of the great price (pit stop not included I think) ... assuming that water injection is only used above 50% there is not much time left when it is not used. ..but impossible to say that like that since we only have the trigger boost pressure: 2,5 Bars
The refueling in water during the grand prix gave rise to a cheating that remained famous in the annals of F1, by the Tyrrell team, in 1983 precisely .... But it was with a V8 atmo (they were the last to use it).Econology wrote:2) Was the amount of water related to the capacity of the fuel tank (in the 100 L)? In other words: were they filling up with water at the same time as petrol? If yes that would allow us to have a more precise report ... otherwise we would also have an idea (if the 12 L are consumed during the GP obviously ...) reported to the overall consumption of the GP (Bucheron at the foot !)
A Grand Prix lasts 305 km + 1 lap or a maximum of 2 hours, the first of the two terms expired.Econology wrote:3) For the 10L / h for 500 cv.h (I trust you on the calculations, I suppose that you started from the air flow rates necessary for the stochiometry by fixing a constant average engine performance?) That can stick ( we are in the order of magnitude at least), Bucheron, a great price how long does it last?
Illustration for the Silverstone GP Sunday 11/06: full load time this year = 71%, full load time last year = 59% ...Woodcutter wrote:[...] It can go much higher for certain "critical" Grand Prix like Monza for example where there, the time of full load (accelerator at bottom) can reach 70% of the total time.
It also evolves with the engines ... For example this year, the V8 are more often than the V10 of 2005. [...]
Woodcutter wrote:Illustration for the Silverstone GP Sunday 11/06: full load time this year = 71%, full load time last year = 59% ...
Go back to "Water injection in heat engines: information and explanations"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 93 guests