Hi Captain!
I just read your speech only now
:
Capt_Maloche wrote:Remember that these (important) results are sensitive on "old" vehicles equipped with naturally aspirated engines.
and that nobody has achieved such results on HDI, DCI and equivalent engines, except 5 to 10% with the addition of SP95 in the GO
1200Kg vehicles today consume less than 5L / 100
the last IV spaces of 1800KG with their wind resistance are around 7,5L / 100
The palm seems to return to PSA engines
and I therefore bring a formal denial to what you are announcing, it comes from an email addressed to me by Alexandre Grégoire, the author of the famous retrofitage of Vitry sur Ornes, with whom I cooperated for the establishment of the GV, with the results we know:
... In terms of results, I'm still around 60
% of depollution and 20 to 30% for consumption,
better being the C15 with 31% for a vehicle of
So town hall which only makes short trips,
others from the town hall are at 20% including a plateau DCI
but the rooms are not isolated and I think
we would gain a little by slightly enlarging the
GV. But it's already not bad.
We are talking about a decrease of 20% on a DCI, and I could even add the words that Christophe Chausse (COPRA) told me about the results of the exhaust gas control of a DC + G + retrofitted in a dealer mechanic equipped with a gas analyzer giving the contents of C0, C02, Nox, O2, particles (in ppm), without, then with steam injection ...
In the first case, the different rates were "in the nails", the engine was running "normally".
When the water supply was turned on, the CO and particulate matter numbers dropped dramatically, so much so that the mechanic thought his probes were messing around!
But they did not mess around, the figures are sometimes stubborn!
But it is true that I often hear this remark which would concern recent vehicles, at high pressure ... on which the gains would be quite low.
During our visit to the test bench at Carnot, with the mercy to Didier, we had an edifying discussion with one of the mechanical teachers, who explained to us that the lowest pollution from recent dci / hdi and other clones was a big lie , because because of a finer spray, by high pressure, we therefore produced ... finer particles, almost invisible in the opacimetry test of technical control centers, but
worst for health, because, of a size of the order of magnitude of the nanometer. They are stuck in the pulmonary alveoli, in a lasting way, and cause a resurgence of respiratory diseases, allergies and cancers ...
When we see the pollution of cities and major traffic corridors, and the number of people around us with these "new diseases", and add to that the proliferation of these new engines, we understand how these results are essential!
We are bringing here and now a "science-less technology", but which irrefutably provides the solution to this serious immediate problem of pollution ...
I quoted a private message from Alexandre, who was committed to giving me his feedback. In his last email, he told me that he would soon create a post on econology concerning his results, but time is passing, and he still hasn't had time to publish them (I know he's very busy! )
I think suddenly make a little update on the GV by a remarkable tip that he slipped me to deal with his mood swings.
Coming soon in the wiki, let's say within a month, I myself am very busy these days, with G ++ in particular ...
A ++
Michel
We were on the brink, but we made a big step forward ...