Silicon wrote:Pantone, we have to believe that it works!
I heard this opinion of a retired engineer.
I share and I like to stay skeptical ....
Fully agree if you ecoutes clowns calling themselves trainer but here (on econologie.com) sorry but there is no room for beliefs! Y is for hypothesis and intuitions but that's it!
So a little advice, before you lises more stupidity than that I advise you to spend a few hours on the site .... a start here: https://www.econologie.com/c-est-quoi-le ... -1313.html
Normally the flow of pages is "logical" ...
And after you can spend a good week dissecting the forum...
Silicon wrote:So if you want to face reality, gather tens of thousands of euros to equip like the pros, a tester on PC board with grabbers, probes, sensors, actuators ( valves etc ...) mounting a reactor surrounded by probes on a recent car and made the road tests. We can then do modeling and design a computer, or enter the car has air pollutes less and put everything in the trash (except the PC I get :-)
It was a bit the idea of this page: https://www.econologie.com/entraide-auto ... s-606.html
Look at the dates to convince yourself that there is not much to expect from such common actions ....
Not to mention that this action is futile to 2 reasons:
1) even with a few thousand € (peanuts) we are not really on equal terms with the manufacturers (several hundred million € for the development of a new engine)
2) And after in the event of a supposed positive result? Are we going to whine at the manufacturers? They have already known for a very long time but as you said so well ... they defend their interests and the interests of those "they love" ... Then there is the NIH too ...
https://www.econologie.com/les-inventeur ... -3022.html