you should, as usual, read more slowly to understand each part:The most funny thing is that GF invokes the work of Senff and Samsel as scientific justification for their hypothesis, except that since this work has been demolished in good and good shape by 2 members of CRIIGEN who are not suspected of collusion ;-) → https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705608/
The effects of glyphosate are well characterized at the concentrations and doses leading to acute toxicity, the results increasing over time and in a dose-dependent manner. The toxic effects on rat liver, measured after the administration of 60 mg / kg of body weight / day of glyphosate over 2 years, were used as a basis for the calculation of the admissible daily dose (0,3 mg / kg bw / day) 2002-2017 (4).However, data regarding the health risks arising ingestion of glyphosate alone at daily doses lower than the authorized regulatory daily dose and which are relevant to human exposure levels are much more limited and the subject of much debate
and especially:
Although there is evidence that glyphosate herbicides are toxic below regulatory safety limits,