sen-no-sen wrote:nico239 wrote:
Hence the question: what would be your tolerance for a decrease in speed?
70, 60, 50? less?
This is a pertinent remark, however we can not extrapolate too far this reflection in the sense that logic would lead us to answer zero.
There is a vehicle power threshold that would make the speed reduction unacceptable to the driver.
For a motorcycle hypersporting roll at 90Km / h is already dragging, for cons 30km / h it is already much too much for the cardio number of cyclists ... the speed on a regulated road of a vehicle can be established through a convergence of parameters of the price / risk type, and the power of a vehicle according to a driving pleasure / purchasing power ratio.
Below a certain speed, it is necessary to have access to a new strategy, that is, to change the mode of transport ... something that governments do not want to put in place for the moment.
Exactly I do not extrapolate I ask what is the tolerance PERSONAL to the slowness ....
Curiously, every time I ask the proponents of lowering speeds it is almost impossible to get an answer.
And I wonder why?
On the other hand the threshold related to the power of the vehicles my faith it is not too the subject.
The new law lowers the speed for safety reasons, too bad for anyone with a Ferrari or a Yamaha R1, also for those 90 it was already weak.
I had a 900 CBR and the QUIET speed is around 130
The question remains to those who believe that this is a good measure.
What would be TA / THEIR PERSONAL tolerance to a drop in speed?
70, 60, 50? less?