"The habit does not make the monk", I repeat it often to you and there are heaps of examples of luminaries who slip in the pseudo-sciences, high studies or not.
Exactly! But the reflection of EK does not make a distinction between what some call pseudo science and other pseudo official sciences, since everyone sees noon at their door.
Absolutely not ! You confuse once again the facts admitted, by a more or less important part of scientists of all kinds, and the use, the interpretation which is made of these facts. Clearly with basic elements that are legos, for example, therefore indisputable facts and according to the way they will be assembled (which depends on the project of each one and not of an automatic assembly of these.) The end result will be different.We tell you from the start, science is a fact admitted by everyone, and we often quote the first person who made a discovery as a scientist, but that is not the main thing.
But your zigotos, themselves pseudo scientists, consider as pseudo sciences "alternative medicines" which have proven their experimental results over thousands of years such as acupuncture, phyto, magnetism, hypnosis, etc ... which did not go through "western science" where, if it had been necessary to wait, humanity would have disappeared for lack of care.
In medicine, the effectiveness of drugs is double-checked, from different angles, and the advantages and disadvantages are drawn, and the main thing is that the benefit / risk ratio is largely in favor of the benefit.
We will try to repeat point by point:
In medicine, the effectiveness of drugs is double-checked,
False! for two main reasons
a) there is no medicine, but allopathic medicine which represents only one, among many much older and distributed around the world
b) All medicines are not double-blinded like vaccines which have a special status (although they are, OFFICIALLY, medicines)… like homeopathy has another.
from different angles and we draw the benefits and drawbacks
This is only partially correct. But these "exams" ONLY concern the toxicity measures, on laboratory animals (because we are mice of course), not the effectiveness of these on humans (see the subject already examined and developed in its time and which you will find on the official sites, therefore indisputable in your eyes.) which will only appear in phase IV
and the main thing is that the risk / benefit ratio be largely in favor of profit.[*]
This risk benefit again concerns toxicity of a product, compared to preliminary tests done on laboratory animals, not on humans. Indeed, here again it is official, phase II concerns individuals, humans, IN GOOD HEALTH, therefore not sick as the Palice would say, in whom it is not a question of benefit compared to a disease that they don't have, but here again for verification of toxicity in voluntary human guinea pigs (that is to say that one pays to endanger their health), then phase III on a larger scale, in unpaid human guinea pigs this blow there to verify the supposed effectiveness established by the lab, on a few thousand individuals, without besides that being specified (in any case I have not read it explicitly,) that it is a question of sick again (but still checking for toxicity). And finally phase IV which is to spread the product to the whole population OF SICK, there, to check in real situation if the profit assumptions announced by the labs are verified as: Servier for its pick, the vioox of Merck (40.000 dead ), thalidomide, diethylstilbestrol ,, methaqualone, Isomeride, Ponderal, (amfepramone) Anorex °, Préfamone Chronules °, Ténuate Dospan °, Moderatan °, (clobenzorex) Dinintel °, (fenproporex) Fenproporex prolonged action Deglaude ° (mefenorex), cholstat or stator, Ximélagatran / Mélagatran, Acomplia (Rimonabant), Dextropropoxyphene (generic name), etc… and its procession of patients for life, even for deaths.
If this is not Russian roulette, what will it be?
Already alternative medicine encompasses lots of different systems and each must be examined according to its particular fields of action and not others. Acupuncture will never put a broken bone back in place, but will help reduce the pain, osteopathy will work on vertebral displacements, for example, not on cancer, etc. Get out of your bubble!For alternative medicine, it's Russian roulette.
[*] this opinion, peremptory, is not shared by all doctors including PR Even who questions these new drugs (under patent of course) which bring no additional benefit to others passed under generics, but who cost at the SS.