I almost agree with you 100% but not at all for the same reasons, it will always amaze me
It's in order of things. Compare that to politics and its different parties. Everyone has a different view on how to govern LA France, despite ways of looking at this governance and often at odds with each other. And no sector of our societies escapes it!
A few years ago I was one of the skeptics of Quebec, and in particular an experience of homeopathic suicide, in short it did not work ...
I saw the video! as stupid behavior one does not do better!
Crazy this is your point of view, I found it couillus at the time, and especially very useful, the first experience showing the ineffectiveness of H on people completely tight to the concept .. [*].
When I say stupid it is related (if we are talking about the same thing) to these attempts at poisoning by homeopathy. Indeed, a diluted "poison",
at minimum dose imposed by French law (1 / 10.000 °) 2CH, does not present any risk in itself including by swallowing a whole tube of these granules. You have to know nothing about the dilution system to indulge in this circus number.
Then there is hysteria, hypnosis, and especially the argument of authority of the prescriber, it is the latter the problem and at the same time the solution.
Argument rehashed at will, but worthless, see below
Substantive employment, PSYCH. A moron (employed alone or with a qualifier). Person whose IQ is less than 80. A light, medium, deep moron. Synon. backward, abnormal, fool, silly.That is to say whose reasoning is that of a small child
If you don't consider cancer to be serious, then obviously homeopathy becomes a useful "placebo".
There it is anything, but cure cancer with a glass of water why not ...
Do not mix everything up :
Or what is considered is the role of the H, and she alone,
or it is a comparison with other therapies.
In this case it is not a question here
THAT of H vis-à-vis certain pathologies including cancer, in this case.
The best medicine is the body itself, observe the effectiveness of fasting for example ...
Of course! but fasting is not a medicine (in the medical sense of the term)
If an individual believes that H can bring him relief, any healing, great bravo without restriction ....
This is valid for any treatment! Do you know (yourself, for example!) A single patient who would not believe in the treatment that his allopathic doctor will give him? So if some believe, why not others!
Religions invented prayers (same fight), you are probably starting to see where I am coming from.
Not being religious, it is up to religious systems to respond to you.
In any case, it will be necessary to die of something with always the same catchphrase "Believe or Know"
Exactly ! when a person is "sick" (no matter what disease for that matter) what does he know about his pathology? Little or nothing, so she defers to the great officially graduated guru who, despite some knowledge, does not know everything and is reduced to believe that BP will bring him the miracle remedy long awaited and which made the success vaccination, for example ... you see where I'm coming from!
[*] once again, this shows the immense ignorance of these jokes. The effectiveness of a product is not measured in the public square with a few characters who want to make the buzz on youtube (but it is their right) but in a scientific way and carried out by competent specialists, not amateurs who have studied nothing about the system involved.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré