Flytox wrote:...
What you advertise above is not attached to the page of presentation of the cost of different energies to the production, and lost some part on the same site?
...
Well no, this is the link I gave at the end of the page.
Flytox wrote:...
The difference is just a few orders of magnitude ..... what to put everything in the same bag!?: Mrgreen:
...
Well no, again, everything is not in the same bag!
It would nevertheless be fair to count the dismantling per MWh produced, just to keep the same orders of magnitude
Flytox wrote:...
The real cost of dismantling is unknown to anyone, BDF etc ..., and ... as the court of accounts fishing rare information available .... at its source .... there is little chance that it diverges.
...
This is what the CoC noted; it also notes that doubling the costs of dismantling and storage would increase the price of electricity by 5%.
By dint of repeating them, you may end up understanding these figures
Flytox wrote:...
In the link below (a bit long) but to read until the end, there are some interesting discussions that allow to see how this happens.
http://energie.sia-partners.com/2009071 ... yaume-uni/
...
Do not work with me this link: it indicates a server error ...
...
The case of the United Kingdom is surprising. Indeed, for only 35 nuclear reactors and an installed capacity of 9 MW, the total decommissioning costs are estimated at 000 billion euros103. , or 2 billion euros per plant. These figures are to be compared with those of the United States, where 2,9 reactors are still in operation, and where the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) estimated the cost of decommissioning at 104 million dollars (around 300 million euros) per plant nuclear.
...
Yeah, it especially makes you think that in England, there are some who seek to eat