Ahmed wrote:Simplifications, of course, because there is no question of explaining everything, but, from elementary logical bricks, to reconstruct the main axes allowing to order the apparent chaos of reality.
I will not speak of simplification but rather of synthesis work.
The rules at work in the Universe are originally relatively simple, so it is in short normal to find them in today's world dressed in a complex fabric.
This recalls the wisdom story of the onion: we progress we remove peels to get to the point, and not by adding materials (ball).
Janic wrote:
The problem is that (because of the multiplicity of disciplines) these grids are excessive simplifications which leave aside other disciplines which would not stick to the proposed model.
I especially see explanatory grids of a religious order in front of others which are more rational.
Yet if we can interpret both, it is about the same thing!
Yet in each "camp", far too many people simply do not want a broader explanatory grid, because it would put them ideologically unemployed!
What I wanted to emphasize is that, as with legos, everyone can build what they want to see happen.
It is not a question of building anything, but of explaining the mechanisms at work.
The problem does not concern engineering but study.