They will not dare anyway? Oil in the Arctic?

[Obamot]

Say see Bham, wouldn't you be a little macho? Poire belle Hélène must be tall enough to determine for herself what is nice or not! If need be I would even be able to hand him my "protective shoulder"

The discussion has slightly deviated, because of Obamat (not good !!!), it's not nice for beautiful pear Hélène, should see to continue this discussion on the initial post https://www.econologie.com/forums/desertec-e ... t5338.html

It is you who deviates since you speak (I quote you) of "risks of conflicts between states". In this sense you were right. Where you are probably wrong is not to consider the alternative of Trans-Mediterranean, as a serious opportunity.

Then you put it back:

Remundo has already shown us that.
Hoping that it will succeed and that it will benefit all countries, developed and underdeveloped, without generating conflicts.

So we're in the middle of it, on the contrary. With regard to the geostrategic balance, the probability of the exploitation of the deposits in this region of the globe and the dilemma potential VS profitability that expose themselves to decision makers.

I give figures: 7 ct the KW / h.
At this price it is no longer exactly profitable to project new very expensive oil wells which will not be profitable in 15 years since they will come to telescope and compete with implementations such as DESERTEC. And above all who will come up against the “econological” reality! (About where are your figures? Lol Because apart from your abstruse denials, you don't bring much to the debate ...).

And besides, it is the cause of fat people! Since the title was edited and changed, which narrowed the meaning.
Unless I am mistaken:
"They won't dare anyway?" ... "
... without specifying who this "he" was ...

We went to
"They won't dare anyway?" Oil in the Arctic? ”

Now the Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation engloble Iceland and the Nordic countries (once again, reread and look at the map) ...

So ... flop. On the other hand, you've been playing it "troll" style for a long time. (but there are also good trolls ...)

[bham]

So say Obamot, did you blow your lead or what? You have to calm down quickly my big one.
I remind you that it was you who got into Desertec (4th message of this post) while Poire Belle Hélène spoke of the foreseeable exploitation of petroleum resources. Hence the fact of having quoted you, without malice and without malice on my part, moreover, which you obviously do not seem to be able to understand to speak to me in this way.
Besides, you lend me words that don't belong to me. And your pitch is completely bogus.
With you I have the impression of finding myself in a playground with a kid in front of me who says to me: "no, you said that and that, and nianiania and nianiania".
But we do not care my po'v Obamot, it is you who diverted the post point barre. If you are not able to bear a mini remark of nothing at all, ben will look elsewhere before insulting people as you do.
And as you seem to know a radius in terms of troll, I give you the Wikipedia definition:

"A troll is an action likely to create a controversy by provoking the participants of a discussion space (of type forum, newsgroup or wiki) on a computer network, including the Internet and Usenet. The word also designates a user who uses this type of action [1].

By metonymy, we speak of a troll for a message whose character is likely to generate controversy or is excessively provocative, without seeking to be constructive, or to which we do not want to respond and that we try to discredit by naming it that way. "

So if your message is not likely to create a controversy by provoking the participants of a discussion space, well I am the pope then.

[Obamot]

You, you, you ...

... if you continue, I will return to live with my mother! ;–)

[bham]

Well go quickly then, she may be the only one to understand you!

[Obamot]

Come on ... a little humor the Austral Ô P'tit Cake!

... we are all supposed to defend the planet ...

[bham]

Well the first thing to do is apologize, if your hypersensitive ego supports it.
Then we'll see if you still talk about humor ....

[Obamot]

Apologies for a question of ononomasiology? If it makes you happy... Well, it's done!

Because what did the article to which Poire Belle Hélène refers to tell us on the TF1 site?

The Arctic [...] could become a major geopolitical issue,

It is already so since, causing international outcry, the Russians had planted their flag there (in the seabed) without asking anyone, a few years ago.

DESERTEC, for its part, is no longer in the planning stage but in progress. And precisely concerning geopolitical issues, this constitutes a considerable advance (bis repetita) ...

The page being turned, and to take into account your remarks, the continuation is here:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post143680.html#143680