janic wrote: The homeo is a fact, a reality recognized and shared all over the world by professionals who practice it, it is in itself a practical proof of its reality
Just as astrology is a "fact", a "reality" recognized and shared all over the world by professionals who practice it, but that does not prove it ...
Except that the professionals in question are doctors, therefore officially recognized as competent by the State by their diploma.
Unless you have specific criteria on the competence or incompetence of doctors around the world? In this case it is necessary to denounce these medics to the orders of doctors and the services of the State! but you may end up with defamation lawsuits!
Janic wrote:
It is the responsibility of whoever puts forward the existence of something to provide proof of it because "one cannot prove the non-existence of a phenomenon".
This is a particular point of view because it is no more possible to prove that this phenomenon does not exist!
That is what I am saying
This is also what I say: not being able to prove that a phenomenon does not exist, simply shows that researchers do not have the adequate tools to provide the necessary proof; it's called ignorance simply. This is what happened for centuries before keys to understanding were found. So you can rightly say
currently Evidence according to specific criteria is not recognized by some, but recognized by others, at the same level of competence.
But practically
users don't care since, apart from the endless discussions, they try this therapy and find themselves well and continue or are not satisfied and stop as with anything else for that matter.
It's like giving him sugar.
This ignorance, coupled with incompetence, is pathetic ... hold on once again!
It's not like a lie by omission.
The question is to know on which side is the lie and there not by omission!
It would not be by chance the doliprane that the mother gave which would have had an effect?
Of course and even diluted to 30hp for more efficiency! It's ridiculous!
Homeopathy "could reduce health costs by a third" And if the granules were sold at a fair price (sweets), it would be even more advantageous
There it borders on stupidity.
Sure, it's a business that works
Much less than big pharma
Obamot, is that your livelihood in defending this illusion with as much ardor?
The same question may be asked to you: it is your livelihood to defend with as much ardor, the "fumisterie" of the chemical poisons of the pharmaceutical industry
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré