Bernard
To have filmed a lot and photographed, I admit that some points like the shadows are confusing but can be explained by a difference in level, moreover on their example, if the light would be near the shadow should widen and it is not is not the case!
As for the focus is also explainable by the size of the lens because the smaller the lens is less blur will appear in the photos, it is known to have seen the devices used that these devices was very compact to limit weight carried away!
When the demarcations in the horizon or it is a white line, if we observe well we can find 2 or 3 on each picture!
For the background or we supposedly see the defect of the screen at 90 degrees that serves as an inclined mirror, it may very well be the superimposed layers of the substrate during the manufacture of the film or the photo itself!
Not at all convinced because many watched at the telescope including the Russians who would have revealed this supposed trickery!
Solar Plasma Shot in Space
Anyway it's theater. After that is the theater how far? Not important :-)
The sharpness of focus obtained with:
- manual distance adjustment (without visible image)
- manual light adjustment,
- manual hold without foot
- a breath on bottles,
it's still a feat: not a single blur on all photos, whatever the operator ...
Your note on the lenses of a camera would be fairer on a 24x36, but here it is a big negative. A small lens would leave optical errors especially on a wide negative: nothing visible here.
Note: not so compact as this anyway:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html
And here are the target conditions:
http://www.apolloarchive.com/apg_thumbnail.php?ptr=108&imageID=S69-31106
But they never move anyway!
And my personal photo experience in handheld devices and big negatives lets me think that it's really a feat.
In fact, the selection of astronauts was made on the control of hasselblad ;-)
No negative made public to my knowledge: on the negative, we would see the numbers.
We should also see in the emulsion all the impacts of particles, many in space: it still attacks the metal stations. And I have not heard of the development of photos in flight (someone has the info?). In which case it would be surprising not to find some impact on all film taken. But not a visible defect on the photos brought back.
When it comes to Kubrick's work, it is special anyway: one can hardly speak of Eyes Wide Shut without touching on sensitive "subjects". You can be aware of events without being able to talk about them, because it is REALLY DANGEROUS. We can't talk about it, but we know it's true. In Belgium, this is not a subject to be taken lightly. And in France, the Outreau trial came at the right time to discredit any future testimony: what examining magistrate would still dare to investigate such a subject?
The sharpness of focus obtained with:
- manual distance adjustment (without visible image)
- manual light adjustment,
- manual hold without foot
- a breath on bottles,
it's still a feat: not a single blur on all photos, whatever the operator ...
Your note on the lenses of a camera would be fairer on a 24x36, but here it is a big negative. A small lens would leave optical errors especially on a wide negative: nothing visible here.
Note: not so compact as this anyway:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html
And here are the target conditions:
http://www.apolloarchive.com/apg_thumbnail.php?ptr=108&imageID=S69-31106
But they never move anyway!
And my personal photo experience in handheld devices and big negatives lets me think that it's really a feat.
In fact, the selection of astronauts was made on the control of hasselblad ;-)
No negative made public to my knowledge: on the negative, we would see the numbers.
We should also see in the emulsion all the impacts of particles, many in space: it still attacks the metal stations. And I have not heard of the development of photos in flight (someone has the info?). In which case it would be surprising not to find some impact on all film taken. But not a visible defect on the photos brought back.
When it comes to Kubrick's work, it is special anyway: one can hardly speak of Eyes Wide Shut without touching on sensitive "subjects". You can be aware of events without being able to talk about them, because it is REALLY DANGEROUS. We can't talk about it, but we know it's true. In Belgium, this is not a subject to be taken lightly. And in France, the Outreau trial came at the right time to discredit any future testimony: what examining magistrate would still dare to investigate such a subject?
0 x
See you soon !
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Alain G said:
???? If I remember correctly, they were Hasselblads, with the "overhead" viewfinder. It's more compact than a Mamya, but still.
these devices were very compact to limit the weight carried!
???? If I remember correctly, they were Hasselblads, with the "overhead" viewfinder. It's more compact than a Mamya, but still.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Hi Elephant!
16 lens mm is still not very big and it does not give a blur pass 4 meters!
Here is a link that gives the objectives according to the missions:
http://www.capcomespace.net/dossiers/ph ... /index.htm
16 lens mm is still not very big and it does not give a blur pass 4 meters!
Here is a link that gives the objectives according to the missions:
http://www.capcomespace.net/dossiers/ph ... /index.htm
0 x
Stepping behind sometimes can strengthen friendship.
Criticism is good if added to some compliments.
Alain
Criticism is good if added to some compliments.
Alain
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79115
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
As you are interested in the subject of the moon, watch this documentary:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2g1gp ... -peti_tech
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2g2tt ... -peti_tech
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2fykm ... -peti_tech
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2g1gp ... -peti_tech
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2g2tt ... -peti_tech
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2fykm ... -peti_tech
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- Former Oceano
- Moderator
- posts: 1571
- Registration: 04/06/05, 23:10
- Location: Lorraine - France
- x 1
Good, cold.
Slowdown Gulf Stream with water immersion point shifted to the south implies increased storms and hurricanes to the South and East Atlantic (holds Xinthia) and possibility for polar winds to come up to our latitudes so winter colder and stronger storms (conjunction hot air and cold polar air).
The Van Allen belt. Earth is bigger than Mars. Her heart is still melting and so she has a circulation of liquid iron that creates a magnetic field of protection. The magnetic shield deflects particles from the solar wind and thus protects us from particles that are deflected and can interact at the poles and high latitudes causing auroras called boreal aurora.
However the other beneficial effect is that the solar wind erodes the atmospheres of the planets. That's how Mars lost its atmosphere and the Earth still has it. Mars has cooled down, it has lost its magnetic field and its atmosphere.
That's it, so we're talking about our beautiful planet again?
Slowdown Gulf Stream with water immersion point shifted to the south implies increased storms and hurricanes to the South and East Atlantic (holds Xinthia) and possibility for polar winds to come up to our latitudes so winter colder and stronger storms (conjunction hot air and cold polar air).
The Van Allen belt. Earth is bigger than Mars. Her heart is still melting and so she has a circulation of liquid iron that creates a magnetic field of protection. The magnetic shield deflects particles from the solar wind and thus protects us from particles that are deflected and can interact at the poles and high latitudes causing auroras called boreal aurora.
However the other beneficial effect is that the solar wind erodes the atmospheres of the planets. That's how Mars lost its atmosphere and the Earth still has it. Mars has cooled down, it has lost its magnetic field and its atmosphere.
That's it, so we're talking about our beautiful planet again?
0 x
[MODO Mode = ON]
Zieuter but do not think less ...
Peugeot Ion (VE), KIA Optime PHEV, VAE, no electric motorcycle yet...
Zieuter but do not think less ...
Peugeot Ion (VE), KIA Optime PHEV, VAE, no electric motorcycle yet...
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
former oceanic wrote:Good, cold.
Slowdown Gulf Stream with water immersion point shifted to the south implies increased storms and hurricanes to the South and East Atlantic (holds Xinthia) and possibility for polar winds to come up to our latitudes so winter colder and stronger storms (conjunction hot air and cold polar air).
The Van Allen belt. Earth is bigger than Mars. Her heart is still melting and so she has a circulation of liquid iron that creates a magnetic field of protection. The magnetic shield deflects particles from the solar wind and thus protects us from particles that are deflected and can interact at the poles and high latitudes causing auroras called boreal aurora.
However the other beneficial effect is that the solar wind erodes the atmospheres of the planets. That's how Mars lost its atmosphere and the Earth still has it. Mars has cooled down, it has lost its magnetic field and its atmosphere.
That's it, so we're talking about our beautiful planet again?
what do you think of the use of atomic ores?
0 x
Too easy !
Note that assumptions about the nature of the Earth's core are not really validated to date ... The tilting of the magnetic poles remains particularly unexplained.
We must also look at this:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm
The authors of this site think that the electric charge of stars and planets have played and still play a very big role in cosmology, a role that is ignored / denied today.
Basically, we added the electric charge of a particle to study it, but we forgot to take it into account for large particles of space ...
And this would explain for example the flash, unexplained at present, which intervened during the "meeting" of the deepimpact probe with the comet Tempel1 http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impac ... patiale%29.
Note that assumptions about the nature of the Earth's core are not really validated to date ... The tilting of the magnetic poles remains particularly unexplained.
We must also look at this:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm
The authors of this site think that the electric charge of stars and planets have played and still play a very big role in cosmology, a role that is ignored / denied today.
Basically, we added the electric charge of a particle to study it, but we forgot to take it into account for large particles of space ...
And this would explain for example the flash, unexplained at present, which intervened during the "meeting" of the deepimpact probe with the comet Tempel1 http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impac ... patiale%29.
0 x
See you soon !
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1596
- Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
- Location: artist land
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 2 Replies
- 2197 views
-
Last message by recyclinage
View the latest post
15/10/09, 12:05A subject posted in the forum : Media and news: TV shows, reports, books, news ...
-
- 0 Replies
- 2161 views
-
Last message by recyclinage
View the latest post
23/09/09, 10:49A subject posted in the forum : Media and news: TV shows, reports, books, news ...
-
- 1 Replies
- 1738 views
-
Last message by recyclinage
View the latest post
27/07/09, 18:53A subject posted in the forum : Media and news: TV shows, reports, books, news ...
-
- 18 Replies
- 24193 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
14/05/11, 16:32A subject posted in the forum : Media and news: TV shows, reports, books, news ...
-
- 3 Replies
- 2597 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
21/03/08, 11:53A subject posted in the forum : Media and news: TV shows, reports, books, news ...
Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 202 guests