by Did67 » 09/09/18, 10:40
Philosophically speaking, I don't think that a "technique", whatever it is, whatever its interest, "solves" a problem. A technique is a way to get a result. Not an end. Not an ethic. With any technique, some men will do the best. And others, the worst! Some will try to "improve" existence. Theirs. That of others ... Others to dominate, earn a lot of money, be the first ...
With current means and knowledge, we could be happy, fair, etc ... It would be enough to organize accordingly!
But that this is not so simple, different threads of discussion here show it clearly. When some are for, others are against. Bio, wind, nuclear, photovoltaic, pellets, etc ... And it's normal, nothing is never perfect in this world, nothing is devoid of defects. From then on, some clench in an idyllic vision where they see only the advantages and hammer them to be right. The others that the defects, that they assemble to bother the first ones, to show them that they exist since they are right!
Philosophically speaking, I think it is men who need to be changed. Not the -isms, which are only the consequences of the psyches of men. Capitalism / Communism have we mentioned somewhere. Some forget that we are not playing on a level playing field when it comes to "chasing our share of the spoils". And that in this game, some stuff themselves and others die. The other than perfect men do not need property and that we can share everything ... And forget that in each of us there is a trickster who, if he can do less, and if others do. do in his place, want to share everything ...
I do not have a solution to this dilemma. Taking some to knock out others with is not ethically feasible.
0 x