Conspiracy is back!

[elephant]

Apparently, we would all be sleeves, unable to reproduce the slightest unitary device, because they do exist and even that a physicist complains of being threatened with death in Wikistrike:

I invite you to read his prose and if only one of the tricks he talks about works, let us know. Personally, I only see allusions to the quilting of badly made sites that have been beating our ears for years (often in the hope of selling us literature)

http://www.wikistrike.com/article-un-ph ... 24877.html

Still, if these things worked, we would still have serious positive feedback, right?

[elephant]

Take, for example, the first patent he talks about:

text of the patent:

http://freenrg.info/Patents/Gravity/FR2 ... ETIQUE.pdf

inventor Mr Christophe Delot

Has he only already demonstrated?

[plasmanu]

I like his way of seeing the world.
But it really goes in all directions.
And something concrete would be welcome.

In any case there is therefore what to do.

[Obamot]

And it is the parchyder which opens the ball ... The double game continues.

Frankly there is MORE THAN RAZ-LE-BOL of this buzz ...

One more thread that you will bring up on .... NOTHING ....

Let one of these mach-thing-things come out on the market and we'll talk about it again.

Plasmanu: it's not because the guy is nice that he masters ball lightning, ok ...

[renaud67]

it's not because the guy is nice that he masters ball lightning, ok ...

We feel the lack in obamot ...

[elephant]

Obamot said:

Let one of these mach-thing-things come out on the market and we'll talk about it again.

That's what I say!

Unless I'm proven that these things work.

For the rest, if the subjects that I launch annoy you, nobody forces you to read them, I think!

[Obamot]

Note that you can go to the toilet with an iPad, you will have to try

Obamot said:

Let one of these mach-thing-things come out on the market and we'll talk about it again.

That's what I say!

Unless I'm proven that these things work.

So what !???

Why do you throw such a thread if you know it?

[plasmanu]

What I like the most :
is to be able to steal an electron from a source that will rebalance these charges alone.

As for solar cells.

After knowing how it all rebalances we don't care. (Nano, quantum, strings ...)
It's the electron theft that counts

[Obamot]

What I like the most :
is to be able to steal an electron from a source that will rebalance these charges alone.

As for solar cells.

After knowing how it all rebalances we don't care. (Nano, quantum, strings ...)
It's the electron theft that counts

Excellent this one

It will be necessary to leave the explanation to the propagandists of the surunity, will be satisfied there.

(note as long as we talk about it ...)

[elephant]

Obamot said:

Why do you throw such a thread if you know it?

1) What can it do to you ....? Are you the one paying?

2) I hope someone will contradict me (in what I know about this topic)

3) Maybe someone more original than Obamot will bring water to the mill

4) There are not only "scientific or pseudo-scientific" facts, there is the "neo-conspiracy" side that challenges, as well as the "official physics" side (and there, I am not at all competent to appreciate the gap)

5) It makes the audience .....

and about conspiracy, here's a nice one:

Zbienew Bzrezinski complains that there are resistance to the NAME, especially on the Internet

http://fr.sott.net/article/11680-Un-peu ... re-Mondial