Bonus energy or investment bonus?

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
User avatar
chatelot16
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6960
Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
Location: Angouleme
x 264




by chatelot16 » 11/04/13, 22:57

Christophe wrote:
Thursday 11 April - 17: 55
Bonus-malus on the energy bill: the Constitutional Council censures a flagship reform of the government


Reasons?


if this is the government's flagship ... we are badly crossed

to say with the voice of gilbert montagné who sees better than the government
0 x
User avatar
Did67
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 20362
Registration: 20/01/08, 16:34
Location: Alsace
x 8685




by Did67 » 12/04/13, 09:49

Christophe wrote:
Reasons?


According to the newspaper Le Monde:

[i] seized by the UMP parliamentarians, considered that the device was "contrary to the principle of equality before public charges".

the constitutional judges considered that excluding professional energy consumption from the scope of the law was illogical: "This exclusion of professional consumption led to premises equipped with the same heating devices, subject to the same tariffs and for some using a common heating device, be included or excluded solely on the basis of whether or not they were used for domestic purposes. "

Second reason for inequality in the eyes of the Council: as in houses or collective housing with individual heating, the bonus-malus also applied to individuals living in buildings equipped with a central heating system that cannot be regulated individually. . This was judged to be in contradiction "with the objective of making each household consumer responsible for their consumption of network energy". Two other complaints relating to the energy consumption cut-off procedure and to wind turbines were however rejected. [/ I]


So do not read too hastily and too "one-sided": it is not the principle that is rejected! On the contrary: it is the fact that it is not applied in the same way to everyone !!!!
0 x
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 12/04/13, 10:28

Did67 wrote:So do not read too hastily and too "one-sided": it is not the principle that is rejected! On the contrary: it is the fact that it is not applied in the same way to everyone !!!!
In the end, what is criticized is that it is not (yet) complicated enough : Mrgreen:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 158 guests