Elephant says:
This technique is effective, it simply requires discipline:
- from…
- from the participants who must be aware that if they have been called to the meeting, it is to demand that they act
And there, hop! You land with an enormous truth, without a minimum of discipline there is no construction of anything that is possible ... We must unfortunately note, that it is a virtue which disappears, and even worse which is completely decried currently.
… PS: I modified 5 negations or double negations before posting this answer.
Double negations are an expression of the general ill-being of humans on this planet, your awareness is for me very significant, continue like this you interest me! (without any notion of judgment!)
Christophe says:
Yes money is important in our societies because it is a means of realization but it surely should not be a goal of life: working to increase your bank account is bullshit but I admit that it actually bandaging more than one ...
To be precise, we should say:
"Money is only a means" et
this is the notion that has long been lost by people, who see money as an outcome.But the one who thinks that it is realistic to "change the world" without money, therefore without material means, is either a very great mind (1 in 1 billion?) Or a big naive ...
There is probably more Being realized than you think on this earth, but they remain discreet for the moment ... Waiting for their time probably ...
Well the original text lacks clarity ...
I would tend to take another option, you may have read a little too fast
Ahmed says:
Thus, enrichment as self-fulfillment cannot coexist with pecuniary enrichment from a methodological point of view.
If it's about changing the world for the better… to get there.
Is it not possible to imagine that certain spirits are sufficiently incorruptible, so that even a mountain of gold does not interest them ...
Elec says:
There is in my opinion (to each his own ...) no contradiction between intellectual, spiritual enrichment and material enrichment.
+1 I share this opinion (subject to incorruptibility)
"To a study (2006) on the question" Is the market economy the best economic system? ",…
Such a low score, it is shameful!
Do they prefer a planned economy to those who answered no or who abstained?
There however I think it is another point of view!
I have the impression that the French have historically been one step ahead of the Americans and this gives them an enormous advantage: they have understood - as Citro rightly says - that
you can imagine a life as full and rich without introducing the concept of money in the sense of wealth!Imagine a positive world, where each building stores carbon and produces more energy than it consumes ... a world where each neighborhood regenerates its water resources, where each wall clears the atmosphere ... a world where each landscape restores the diversity of living things ... a world where road networks, wastelands, deserts produce green fuels for all ... A world where 6,5 billion people participate in positive growth, where each economic activity creates skilled jobs, by restoring and enriching the ecological capital of humanity.
Here I find Elec in all its splendor, and I applaud with both hands, this is exactly what I have always thought of!
Capt_Maloche says:
The problem with the market economy is that it is based on "always more", by which means growth, and that our world cannot bear such "pressure".
This is the very reason why is breaking the figure, remember the little quote "he who believes that exponential growth can continue indefinitely in a finite world is crazy, or ... An economist" . What clairvoyance is it not? but who heard this sentence?
result: there are too many of us
I do not believe that this is completely true either, too numerous for the model that we have implemented yes.
Question: should demography be regulated?
All the dictators in the world did it before you proposed it! But I don't think this is really a solution.
We will soon be 9 billion according to INED, the slightest natural disaster ... than humanly.
This is exactly what will happen "probably" (knowingly put in quotes) since in reality ... it has already started ...
On a global scale, what is the economy worth? nothing, it's our survival we're talking about.
Here we can only applaud again, I follow you 100%!
Freedom, yes, but not if it sends us into the wall, if not, what is the use of our leaders? Ah yes, it's true, they are puppets ...
No comment!
Citro says:
Well, I answered "yes" but considering that the enrichment is not only considered on its only FINNANCIAL aspect ...
Personally, having the leisure to learn, to exchange, and to communicate is an enrichment.
For that I am very attached to the concept of WORKER LESS that refuses to integrate our president. I am very attached to the idea of working better to share, share and save.
+10 Great Gods that it is a pleasure to read things so sweet to the eyes!
As often, I could have written it myself, but you say it so much better
Sorry to have been so long, but I preferred to make a summary rather than forcing the individual to go back ...
Greetings to all from Lietseu