Torch hydrogen ARGENTINA

[rodibruno]

translated from Portuguese, I hope, forgive mistakes:

We There ... The book:

Lyne - Occult Ether Physics - Tesla's Hidden Space Propulsion
System - 2Nd Edn (1997) .pdf

You are in Emule or qbitorrent (Linux) or in infected or Emulator Bitorrent of Ruindows .. Already also posted on my 4shared ... But what we learned in this book? In the last chapter, he gives an example of a technology that is being suppressed by apologetic interests.
He shows that proponents of the theory of relativity as
On Quantum mechanics necessary to bury the concept of ETER Establish the principles of their chances. It was, however, a practical problem> Until the 40s she sold a hydrogen welding machine which came to be replaced by MIG and TIG. This H2 achieved by 3600 degree soldering, melting tungsten and the secret is simple: A stream of PURE H2 was forced to pass through a Voltaico arch with tungsten electrodes. The effect was that the H2, Molecular Hydrogen, is separated into 2H, the atomic hydrogen, and then Its shot became many, many times stronger, with very
More heat production. The author claims that the 'injection of 109,3 Cal / mol H2 in which it was released 2H to burn 109.000 Cal / mol (1058 times more powerful) However, since they could not explain the LOWER matter done that they produce more power Bury the concept with the help of many systems of measurement The quantities that generate great confusion, even among academics.
Past to compare the power of hydrogen with gasoline and Convinced The academic community that H2 was only three times more powerful, which is not true H2 convert to 2H.
This conversion is more than the extreme heat that makes the job what if the use of fires with arc electrodes producing a lot of UV tungsten. Anyway, thinking about H2 heat before injecting not only is fully justified By Joaquim paradoxical ..
But how do you do it in practice? Already discovered that the mere fact of the External heat captured by the sensor is not stupid enough for the desired effect (even if some do question). Could put these indoor coils - Pantone - but I see is that the spark plug injection system is the best performance. Explanation: The normal working temperature of the candles is 800 degrees. One of the problems of Candle Extender (commonly castles) is hampering proper Cooling of the ends of the candles, bringing problems (castles are workarounds) However, when you inject H2 in a veil, by Gant L'Entre- two castles, (I explained it before), the H2 cools the candle while receiving the heat which turns into 2H .. Capisce? You only have
Advantage ...

regards
Rhodes

[jonule]

"On The quantum mechanics necessary to bury the concept of ETER Establish the principles of their chances."

very good reflection, tangible and logical explanation! the technique buried by an unstoppable scientific demonstration, or how to prove that GMOs are not harmful to health ;-)

or NRJ du vide, in short these are just words anyway.





> you are also talking about the transformation of H2 into 2H, well done, there are indeed:
molecular hydrogen, atomic hydrogen (di-atomic?), parahydrogen (4H?) and orthohydrogen.

due to the physical design and the applied transformation (example tungsten electrode) the hydrogen produced is not the same, and neither is its POWER!
heat, electricity or resonance whatever.

which explains well that the gas produced can be of different power (and thereby bring down the simple faraday barrier, or "by flow measurement" of a hydrogen which would always have the same power).

and how it recombines, and for how long (1 minute, 1 second, 1 ms?): and how it should be used!

on econology, we know that the gas is flammable, we know that a flammable gas increases an engine left at idle, but we do not know how to exploit this gas in an engine ... too zero!
I think it is important that at the exit there is a shape of "bell" with a slow rise, and curve. see "joe cell pipe" for example: form of physical recombination? not impossible ...




Rodibruno, is your explanation only valid for petrol engines = spark plug?

otherwise your explanation clearly speaks of MULTIPLAZ:
http://www.multiplaz.cn/FRA/about.asp
PS: choose your language well.

they rise to 8000 ° C ... we are far from 3600 ° C! obtained with a "classic faraday type electrolysis": cheezy:

but rather look at the power of the plasma:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb2wRSw-Ylg

PS: good translation! -)

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------

THEREFORE :
resume the production of gas (HHO or H2) from the pantone, AND re-introduce it into an electrolyser?

WHY NOT ! these 2 technologies touch even closely on this forum, but never met

[rodibruno]

"On The quantum mechanics necessary to bury the concept of ETER Establish the principles of their chances."

very good reflection, tangible and logical explanation! the technique buried by an unstoppable scientific demonstration, or how to prove that GMOs are not harmful to health ;-)

or NRJ du vide, in short these are just words anyway.





> you are also talking about the transformation of H2 into 2H, well done, there are indeed:
molecular hydrogen, atomic hydrogen (di-atomic?), parahydrogen (4H?) and orthohydrogen.

due to the physical design and the applied transformation (example tungsten electrode) the hydrogen produced is not the same, and neither is its POWER!
heat, electricity or resonance whatever.

which explains well that the gas produced can be of different power (and thereby bring down the simple faraday barrier, or "by flow measurement" of a hydrogen which would always have the same power).

and how it recombines, and for how long (1 minute, 1 second, 1 ms?): and how it should be used!

on econology, we know that the gas is flammable, we know that a flammable gas increases an engine left at idle, but we do not know how to exploit this gas in an engine ... too zero!
I think it is important that at the exit there is a shape of "bell" with a slow rise, and curve. see "joe cell pipe" for example: form of physical recombination? not impossible ...




Rodibruno, is your explanation only valid for petrol engines = spark plug?

otherwise your explanation clearly speaks of MULTIPLAZ:
http://www.multiplaz.cn/FRA/about.asp
PS: choose your language well.

they rise to 8000 ° C ... we are far from 3600 ° C! obtained with a "classic faraday type electrolysis": cheezy:

but rather look at the power of the plasma:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb2wRSw-Ylg

PS: good translation! -)

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------

THEREFORE :
resume the production of gas (HHO or H2) from the pantone, AND re-introduce it into an electrolyser?

WHY NOT ! these 2 technologies touch even closely on this forum, but never met

Didn't you notice the design of the book?
is an electrolizador that supplies oxygen and hydrogen separately, is a very simple diagram, the tube that transports the hydrogen is heated by a gas discharge passing through an electric arc. I can't publish the photo, no how.
say it was largely commercial machine, which ceased producirce ...

[Capt_Maloche]

yes, we already talked about Multiplaz here https://www.econologie.com/forums/fabricatio ... 0-140.html

it is not electrolysis, but water directly projected on an arc, the efficiency is significantly lower to that of an electrolysis, but the flame produced is hotter

But by the way, what difference do you make between H2 and 2H? hmm?

I know this:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Prot ... ritium.jpg

Examples of hydrogen bonds: H2O ... H − O − H; −C = O ... H − O − H

Hydrogen is the only element for which each isotope has a specific name, because their mass difference relative to hydrogen is significant (from simple to double or triple, which explains why, unlike what is true for isotopes in general in the introductory chemistry courses, these differences can influence the chemical properties of deuterium or tritium compared to protium (isotopic effect.) The 3 isotopes of hydrogen are:

* light hydrogen (H2 or protium 1H)) ; it is the most abundant (~ 99,98%). Simply made up of a proton and therefore not having a neutron, it is a stable isotope.
* deuterium (2H or D) ; much less abundant (~ 0,015% on average; from 0,0184 to 0,0082% of natural hydrogen), it has a proton and a neutron and it is a stable isotope.
* tritium (3H or T) ; Made up of a proton and two neutrons, it is only present in tiny quantities (one atom of tritium for 1018 atoms of hydrogen). Unstable, it is the only radioactive isotope of hydrogen, of which it apparently has the same chemical and physical properties except that it is transformed into 3He by emission of an electron (radioactivity β− ). 2H and 3H can participate in nuclear fusion reactions ...
Its radiotoxicity is reputed to be very low when it is present in HTO form (tritiated water), it is less known and to date less well understood when it is emitted by an organic form (the studies show contradictory or very variable results depending on their experimental protocols) [5]. In the environment, tritium can take the place of hydrogen in all the molecules where it is present, including in the “biological” molecules and even in the DNA where it can cause DNA breakage, cell mutations or apoptosis. Tritium is a rare element which explains a generally very low concentration of water or tissues (apart from accidental contamination linked to an anthropogenic source of tritium).
* quaternium or tetradium (4H or Q) is the most unstable isotope of neutron-emitting hydrogen. [6] Its half-life is very short: 1,39 × 10−22 seconds

[moinsdewatt]

translated from Portuguese, I hope, forgive mistakes:

We There ... The book:

Lyne - Occult Ether Physics - Tesla's Hidden Space Propulsion
System - 2Nd Edn (1997) .pdf

You are in Emule or qbitorrent (Linux) or in infected or Emulator Bitorrent of Ruindows .. Already also posted on my 4shared ... But what we learned in this book? In the last chapter, he gives an example of a technology that is being suppressed by apologetic interests.
He shows that proponents of the theory of relativity as
On Quantum mechanics necessary to bury the concept of ETER Establish the principles of their chances. It was, however, a practical problem> Until the 40s she sold a hydrogen welding machine which came to be replaced by MIG and TIG. This H2 achieved by 3600 degree soldering, melting tungsten and the secret is simple: A stream of PURE H2 was forced to pass through a Voltaico arch with tungsten electrodes. The effect was that the H2, Molecular Hydrogen, is separated into 2H, the atomic hydrogen, and then Its shot became many, many times stronger, with very
More heat production. The author claims that the 'injection of 109,3 Cal / mol H2 in which it was released 2H to burn 109.000 Cal / mol (1058 times more powerful) However, since they could not explain the LOWER matter done that they produce more power Bury the concept with the help of many systems of measurement The quantities that generate great confusion, even among academics.
Past to compare the power of hydrogen with gasoline and Convinced The academic community that H2 was only three times more powerful, which is not true H2 convert to 2H.
This conversion is more than the extreme heat that makes the job what if the use of fires with arc electrodes producing a lot of UV tungsten. Anyway, thinking about H2 heat before injecting not only is fully justified By Joaquim paradoxical ..
But how do you do it in practice? Already discovered that the mere fact of the External heat captured by the sensor is not stupid enough for the desired effect (even if some do question). Could put these indoor coils - Pantone - but I see is that the spark plug injection system is the best performance. Explanation: The normal working temperature of the candles is 800 degrees. One of the problems of Candle Extender (commonly castles) is hampering proper Cooling of the ends of the candles, bringing problems (castles are workarounds) However, when you inject H2 in a veil, by Gant L'Entre- two castles, (I explained it before), the H2 cools the candle while receiving the heat which turns into 2H .. Capisce? You only have
Advantage ...

regards
Rhodes

on some forum this kind of post goes directly to the trash.
Not very serious a guy who rocks this kind of cloth. In real life someone who talks to you like that, you change the sidewalk .....

[Capt_Maloche]

the secret Is simple: A flow of PURE H2 was forced to pass through a Voltaico arch with tungsten electrodes. The effect was that the H2, molecular hydrogen, is separated into 2H, the atomic hydrogen, and then its firing became much, many times stronger, with very
More heat production. The author claims that the 'injection of 109,3 Cal / mol H2 in which it was released 2H to burn 109.000 Cal / mol (1058 times more powerful) However, since they could not explain the LOWER matter done that they produce more power Bury the concept with the help of many systems of measurement The quantities that generate great confusion, even among academics.
Past to compare the power of hydrogen with gasoline and Convinced The academic community that H2 was only three times more powerful, which is not true H2 convert to 2H.

That's a bit what Stanley Meyer explained when he spoke of "explosive energy"

So, is this 2H produced by the passage of H2 over an electric arc?
What is the calorific value of 2H?

[Christophe]

What is the calorific value of 2H?

2H I don't know, don't know!

But H + (atomic hydrogen) is 4 times more than H2 !!

[jonule]

mono-atomic,
para-atomic?

their lifespan is too short: it must be injected (as M said ...)

[Capt_Maloche]

Yeah, and how is this H + produced?

H + it is an ion, it is only in aqueous form right?

Remundo, you're here?

I found this, which I don't have time to read this morning: http://www.fyam.ucl.ac.be/enseignement/ ... index.html

[jonule]

aqueous medium: water or vapor?
vapor, is there a typical drop size?

if its life is too short and must be injected (in any way) it must not live long in the air hose of the carburetor (vacuum and not injected pressure) ... in this case it is recombine in another form ... how to make it last, by what catalyst?

good research, and good find
...