sicetaitsimple wrote:You provide yourself with a bullet torch of your own production entitled "Iniquitous punctures in the pocket of prosumers".
Insults are the arguments of those who do not have them! Says the popular saying of common sense
sicetaitsimple wrote:What seems perfectly unfair to me, to tell you the truth, is that someone can repay an investment of € 37000 in 5 years with the income generated and then benefit for 10 years from € 6000 to € 7000 / year taken out of their pockets. non-prosumers, who most often have neither the financial means nor the technical capacity (tenant, apartment, etc.) to carry out even a small installation.
Your speech is just indecent.
It is wrong to believe or to make people believe (pujadistically) that it is "
taken in the pocket of non-prosumers, who most often have neither the financial means nor the technical capacity (tenant, apartment, etc.) to carry out even a small installation ».
1) I have already argued that nuclear production has been paid for by everyone and therefore, analogically, it is normal for everyone rich or poor to participate in the collective (and urgent) effort to fight global warming ; but is no worse deaf than….
2) Your remark is false because during the auspicious era of PV (subsidies and green loans), it was even possible for the unemployed to equip themselves with PV, as evidenced by this person on the forum DH (major Belgian daily newspaper):
«
Coolraoul - Belgium 28.02.13 | 08:12 "reserved for upstarts"? I have been unemployed for 2 years and have installed 6600 kWp. The green loan and advance CVs do the rest. Uncultivated you are, uneducated you will remain " (on the forum ).
So you had to take the
train long before it leaves the station and I took it, certainly by depriving myself of holidays and luxury expenses! Cicadas or ants you have to choose your camp with full responsibility and not come to complain after!