Reduce nuclear energy to 50%, a senseless promise

[Janic]

It is one of the human characteristics to turn like a weather vane with the wind of fears which follow desires which will be followed by other fears. Shale gas scared, then kept its promises of low cost energy for consumers who go where their interests are, especially in America, then its promises of "endless" energy broke. mouth and therefore the weather vane turns again to nuclear power while waiting for one of those big accidents to which they are accustomed.
Now we are in France, not in Ukraine or Japan and it is the opinion of the French that counts. We do not have shale gas (at least allowed) and as the saying goes "thrushes fault we eat blackbirds"because, oddly," we "don't want wind turbines, nor anything else that spoils the landscape, but" 'we "don't want nuclear power plants and their pretty towers that nevertheless decorate the landscape. central in the heart of Paris or Lyon would necessarily appeal to its defenders. For years the Ile Seguin, former stronghold of Renault factories, would have made the ideal place for that: a mess of water and no network losses and waste could have been stored, in the sewers of Paris which drain enough water to cool them No?

[geo444]

.
You have to be COHERENT: the only area where you are the 3Green Country in Europe, Electricity !
- admire this beautiful Real Time Electricity Map:
https://www.electricitymap.org/?page=map&solar=false&remote=true&wind=false

We Do not Know How to Stop Nuclear at Low Cost = it costs +++ Dear to stop it ...
... than to make it as reliable as possible ... and enjoy!

the Serious Accident of Fukushima is first -1 A Network Shutdown followed ...
-2 One of Drowning of Emergency Power Supplies : Batteries, Emergency Generator Sets ...
-3 and Panic 100% Private Technicians of Vital Info !

If you want to avoid getting into one in France, eg. Stationary Storm with Gusts Cutting the Network
we have already had some very devastating: Nimes, Vaison, the Aude in 2018 ...
- It MUST imperatively ADD a Silent and non Polluting Supply in ...
... the Order Rooms = the Only Place where Security remained MAXI in All Accidents
it will prevent our technicians from recovering Auto Batteries in the Neighborhood!
+ they will always have All Info and Functional Commands in the Control Rooms!

To do this, there are Rescue Groups based on Hydrogen Fuel Cell (H2sys)!
- they can also be developed to work with ethanol (or methane)
Reforming "On Board" via the 40% of Heat Lost by the Battery is developed by Nissan ...

These Groups are: Silent, No Pollutant, No Vibration = Compatible with a Control Room
In case of Loss of Network + Drowning of the Classical Rescue Groups they Assure the Functions:
- Continuity of the values ​​transmitted by all the Sensors = Vital Function of a Control Room!
- Functional commands - except Enormous Consumers Remaining Doubled in Manual ...
- Functional Telecom = we must be able to continue to communicate with everyone ...
Watch the movies summarizing the Cata of Fukushima: it's All that Missed!
... Recovering TOO LATE from Auto Batteries in the Neighborhood was not enough ...

the details here http://france.eco.h2.free.fr/FranceEcoH2d.html

People from Areva, CEA, EDF, Framatome, Trade unions, etc ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please go back !

[izentrop]

The suicidal logic of the ADEME continues: Nuclear electricity not cheap enough, we prefer to scuttle a decarbonated technique that works to promote even more expensive and inefficient ENR. https://www.sauvonsleclimat.org/fr/base ... -longtemps

[izentrop]

A large number of our citizens have just expressed their concern at the lack of action taken in France to protect the climate, in a recent petition initiated by several NGOs. Indeed, although a very good student among the developed countries for the level of its CO2 emissions, France has taken a significant delay in their reduction vis-à-vis the commitments made at the COP21.



It has fallen behind because it has focused its efforts on electricity, particularly the replacement of nuclear energy by intermittent electric renewables (wind and photovoltaic). However, electricity in France causes very little greenhouse gas emissions because nuclear power and hydroelectricity do not produce them. Multiplying wind turbines and photovoltaic panels in France can not therefore be used to significantly reduce CO2 emissions. The lobbies defenders of this policy aim especially at the suppression of the nuclear power without worrying too much about the climate. Moreover, they everywhere claim that wind and photovoltaic are competitive: they no longer need subsidies!



It is high time to stop this waste. https://www.sauvonsleclimat.org/fr

[Exnihiloest]

2035 due date for 50% of nuclear power generation (Rugy)

AFP 18 November 2018
...

In 2035, the politicians in power will no longer be the same, and they will explain why this suicidal option can no longer be retained.

[Exnihiloest]

The suicidal logic of the ADEME continues: Nuclear electricity not cheap enough, we prefer to scuttle a decarbonated technique that works to promote even more expensive and inefficient ENR. https://www.sauvonsleclimat.org/fr/base ... -longtemps

"ADEME therefore suggests not to abuse the cheapest and least carbon-intensive electricity production, ie the existing nuclear fleet, and to hurry up the French electricity bill. ..."

Is not that what ecologists want?
They would have changed their minds?