Fission, fusion and nuclear waste

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Exnihiloest » 17/11/18, 18:59

Forhorse wrote:Ah, the troll is astrophysicist now ...

When we have nothing to say, we have the right to be silent. If we could avoid the argumentum ad personam, the debate would be healthier, and above all smarter.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Exnihiloest » 17/11/18, 19:04

izentrop wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:JPP has produced theories, they are refutable, it is scientific work, whether he is right or wrong.
Yeah! its MHD period, UFOs and water engine "scientific work"? Mouarff! : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:

For the rest concerning nuclear, I completely agree;)

MHD and "water engine" have nothing to do with it. MHD is a recognized scientific discipline.
"water engine" refers to an engine whose energy would be water, there we are in delirium. But I am not aware that JPP has ever embarked on this path (the Pantone technique is something else).

Then there is a distinction to be made between his scientific publications and his presentations to the general public. From what I read, his theory of astrophysics is no more delusional than many others (and even less than for example the multi-universes of Everett, who considers that a universe is created at each event And yet, it is very scientific, it is an interpretation of quantum mechanics perfectly compatible with its formalism).
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by izentrop » 17/11/18, 19:22

Exnihiloest wrote:"water engine" refers to an engine whose energy would be water, there we are in delirium. But I am not aware that JPP has ever embarked on this path (the Pantone technique is something else).
No, it's also pseudo-scientific delirium

You seem sharp on certain scientific subjects, but ignore others. : Shock:
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Exnihiloest » 17/11/18, 19:46

izentrop wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:"water engine" refers to an engine whose energy would be water, there we are in delirium. But I am not aware that JPP has ever embarked on this path (the Pantone technique is something else).
No, it's also pseudo-scientific delirium

You seem sharp on certain scientific subjects, but ignore others. : Shock:


"The PMC Pantone or Gillier Pantone system is an unconventional process for injecting fuel into internal combustion engines."
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moteur_Pantone
The explanation of its hypothetical functioning appealed to known theories.
It is at worst an invention that does not work, without interest, even a scam.
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by izentrop » 18/11/18, 00:13

Column co-signed by François-Marie Bréon, deputy director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Michael Shellenberger, president of Environmental Progress, Valérie Faudon, co-founder of Nuclear for Climate, and your servant, published in Le Monde, dated 16 November 2018

To help avoid climate chaos in the world, Europe must set an example of an economy free of fossil fuels. For this, it will be imperative to remove coal from electricity production in less than 30 years: mission impossible without nuclear energy ...
The history of humanity is that of the stacking of energies: each new source has been added to the previous ones. The mills and the horse have been added to the arms, coal to wood, nuclear and gas and oil ... Climate change requires us to move from stacking to substitution: low-carbon energies must replace energies fossils. ..
https://jancovici.com/publications-et-c ... mbre-2018/
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Janic » 18/11/18, 08:17

No, it's also pseudo-scientific delirium

The real delirium is to have understood nothing about what science is and not just materialist science. And when they are pseudo scientists who want to be judges (in ignorance) of what they call pseudo scientists: there yes it is delirium!
What you forget, and your followers of false science (who express themselves like all sects) also, is that what is called science is only an attempt to explain existing phenomena and which come out of theories or usual "scientific" beliefs. However trying to explain and achieving it are two different things and, fortunately, that we have never waited for pseudo or real scientists to give explanations about the real world around us, so that it exists and works.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Exnihiloest » 18/11/18, 14:16

Janic wrote:
No, it's also pseudo-scientific delirium

The real delirium is to have understood nothing about what science is and not just materialistic science ...

Possible explanation why no one other than you understands what science is:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effet_Dunning-Kruger
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Exnihiloest » 18/11/18, 14:25

izentrop wrote:
Column co-signed by François-Marie Bréon, deputy director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Michael Shellenberger, president of Environmental Progress, Valérie Faudon, co-founder of Nuclear for Climate, and your servant, published in Le Monde, dated 16 November 2018

To help avoid climate chaos in the world, Europe must set an example of an economy free of fossil fuels. For this, it will be imperative to remove coal from electricity production in less than 30 years: mission impossible without nuclear energy ...
[...]
https://jancovici.com/publications-et-c ... mbre-2018/

Very good reference. The fable of "inevitable anthropogenic warming if nothing is done", will have at least had a positive effect, the awareness of the obviousness of the solution for energy, nuclear.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Janic » 18/11/18, 14:33

Possible explanation why no one other than you understands what science is:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effet_Dunning-Kruger
are you citing that because of yourself?
However, claiming to be scientific by limiting oneself to a small portion of a particular field by ignoring everything that is opposed to scientism as it becomes, brings no real knowledge. And since you like to quote Wikipedia, meditate on what it defines the meaning: "Science is the body of knowledge and studies of universal value, characterized by an object and a method based on observations ."
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fission, fusion and nuclear waste




by Exnihiloest » 23/11/18, 17:18

Janic wrote:
Possible explanation why no one other than you understands what science is:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effet_Dunning-Kruger
are you citing that because of yourself?

Of course, we will say it like that.

However, claiming to be scientific by limiting oneself to a small portion of a particular field by ignoring everything that is opposed to scientism as it becomes, brings no real knowledge. And since you like to quote Wikipedia, meditate on what it defines the meaning: "Science is the body of knowledge and studies of universal value, characterized by an object and a method based on observations ."

Wikipedia is just a starting point with a wealth of external references for those who want to delve into the subjects. You don't need it since you know you already have all the skills. I'm not so lucky to have science infused!
0 x

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 243 guests