Forhorse wrote:Ah, the troll is astrophysicist now ...
When we have nothing to say, we have the right to be silent. If we could avoid the argumentum ad personam, the debate would be healthier, and above all smarter.
Forhorse wrote:Ah, the troll is astrophysicist now ...
izentrop wrote:Yeah! its MHD period, UFOs and water engine "scientific work"? Mouarff!Exnihiloest wrote:JPP has produced theories, they are refutable, it is scientific work, whether he is right or wrong.
For the rest concerning nuclear, I completely agree;)
No, it's also pseudo-scientific deliriumExnihiloest wrote:"water engine" refers to an engine whose energy would be water, there we are in delirium. But I am not aware that JPP has ever embarked on this path (the Pantone technique is something else).
izentrop wrote:No, it's also pseudo-scientific deliriumExnihiloest wrote:"water engine" refers to an engine whose energy would be water, there we are in delirium. But I am not aware that JPP has ever embarked on this path (the Pantone technique is something else).
You seem sharp on certain scientific subjects, but ignore others.
Column co-signed by François-Marie Bréon, deputy director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Michael Shellenberger, president of Environmental Progress, Valérie Faudon, co-founder of Nuclear for Climate, and your servant, published in Le Monde, dated 16 November 2018
To help avoid climate chaos in the world, Europe must set an example of an economy free of fossil fuels. For this, it will be imperative to remove coal from electricity production in less than 30 years: mission impossible without nuclear energy ...
The history of humanity is that of the stacking of energies: each new source has been added to the previous ones. The mills and the horse have been added to the arms, coal to wood, nuclear and gas and oil ... Climate change requires us to move from stacking to substitution: low-carbon energies must replace energies fossils. ..
https://jancovici.com/publications-et-c ... mbre-2018/
No, it's also pseudo-scientific delirium
Janic wrote:No, it's also pseudo-scientific delirium
The real delirium is to have understood nothing about what science is and not just materialistic science ...
izentrop wrote:Column co-signed by François-Marie Bréon, deputy director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Michael Shellenberger, president of Environmental Progress, Valérie Faudon, co-founder of Nuclear for Climate, and your servant, published in Le Monde, dated 16 November 2018
To help avoid climate chaos in the world, Europe must set an example of an economy free of fossil fuels. For this, it will be imperative to remove coal from electricity production in less than 30 years: mission impossible without nuclear energy ...
[...]
https://jancovici.com/publications-et-c ... mbre-2018/
are you citing that because of yourself?Possible explanation why no one other than you understands what science is:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effet_Dunning-Kruger
Janic wrote:are you citing that because of yourself?Possible explanation why no one other than you understands what science is:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effet_Dunning-Kruger
However, claiming to be scientific by limiting oneself to a small portion of a particular field by ignoring everything that is opposed to scientism as it becomes, brings no real knowledge. And since you like to quote Wikipedia, meditate on what it defines the meaning: "Science is the body of knowledge and studies of universal value, characterized by an object and a method based on observations ."
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 243 guests