Strategy for manipulating the population and opinion in 10 rules

philosophical debates and companies.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Christophe » 13/07/18, 22:02

In the same kind:

To stifle any revolt in advance, do not do it in a violent way. Methods like those of Hitler are outdated. It is enough to create such a powerful collective conditioning that the very idea of ​​revolt will not even come to the minds of men. The ideal would be to format the individuals from the birth by limiting their innate biological aptitudes (cf the individuals of type alpha, beta, gamma). Then, we would continue conditioning by drastically reducing education, to bring it back to a form of professional integration. An uneducated individual has only a limited horizon of thought, and the more his thought is limited to mediocre preoccupations, the less he can revolt. It must be ensured that access to knowledge becomes increasingly difficult and elitist. That the gap between the people and science is widening, that the information intended for the general public is anesthetized by any subversive content. Above all, no philosophy. Here again, we must use persuasion and not direct violence: we will massively broadcast, via television, entertainment always flattering the emotional or the instinctive. We will occupy the minds with what is futile and playful. It is good, in a chat and incessant music, to prevent the mind from thinking. We will put sexuality at the forefront of human interests. As a social tranquillizer, there is nothing better. (see the role of drugs and sex in Huxley's novel) In general, we will make sure to ban the seriousness of existence, to make fun of anything that has a high value, to maintain a constant apology for lightness; so that the euphoria of advertising becomes the standard of human happiness and the model of freedom. Conditioning will thus produce of itself such integration, that the only fear - that it will be necessary to maintain - will be that of being excluded from the system and thus no longer being able to access the conditions necessary for happiness. The mass man, thus produced, must be treated as he is: a calf, and he must be watched as a flock must be. Anything that makes his lucidity sleep is good socially, which would threaten to awaken him must be ridiculed, smothered, fought. Any doctrine involving the system must first be designated as subversive and terrorist and those who support it must then be treated as such. It is observed, however, that it is very easy to bribe a subversive individual: it suffices to offer him money and power (the proposition is in the novel!).

with the confirmation of the author: Serge Carfantan, 2007, lesson 163: Wisdom and revolt
0 x
User avatar
guibnd
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 270
Registration: 24/07/17, 14:58
Location: Normandy - eure
x 68

Re:




by guibnd » 19/07/18, 11:31

Christophe wrote:Elephant thank you, I put the .pdf on the web host: https://www.econologie.com/fichiers/par ... DIWNAt.pdf

thank you elephant and christophe for this reference, I put it aside to read during my holidays ... very informative! ...
0 x
Twandering with clayey and fertile wheat, full of water in winter, cold in spring, crushed and cracked in summer,
but that was before the Didite ...
User avatar
guibnd
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 270
Registration: 24/07/17, 14:58
Location: Normandy - eure
x 68

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by guibnd » 19/07/18, 12:40

Christophe wrote:In the same kind:

To stifle any revolt in advance, do not do it in a violent way. Methods like those of Hitler are outdated. It is enough to create such a powerful collective conditioning that the very idea of ​​revolt will not even come to the minds of men. The ideal would be to format the individuals from the birth by limiting their innate biological aptitudes (cf the individuals of type alpha, beta, gamma). Then, we would continue conditioning by drastically reducing education, to bring it back to a form of professional integration. An uneducated individual has only a limited horizon of thought, and the more his thought is limited to mediocre preoccupations, the less he can revolt. It must be ensured that access to knowledge becomes increasingly difficult and elitist. That the gap between the people and science is widening, that the information intended for the general public is anesthetized by any subversive content. Above all, no philosophy. Here again, we must use persuasion and not direct violence: we will massively broadcast, via television, entertainment always flattering the emotional or the instinctive. We will occupy the minds with what is futile and playful. It is good, in a chat and incessant music, to prevent the mind from thinking. We will put sexuality at the forefront of human interests. As a social tranquillizer, there is nothing better. (see the role of drugs and sex in Huxley's novel) In general, we will make sure to ban the seriousness of existence, to make fun of anything that has a high value, to maintain a constant apology for lightness; so that the euphoria of advertising becomes the standard of human happiness and the model of freedom. Conditioning will thus produce of itself such integration, that the only fear - that it will be necessary to maintain - will be that of being excluded from the system and thus no longer being able to access the conditions necessary for happiness. The mass man, thus produced, must be treated as he is: a calf, and he must be watched as a flock must be. Anything that makes his lucidity sleep is good socially, which would threaten to awaken him must be ridiculed, smothered, fought. Any doctrine involving the system must first be designated as subversive and terrorist and those who support it must then be treated as such. It is observed, however, that it is very easy to bribe a subversive individual: it suffices to offer him money and power (the proposition is in the novel!).

with the confirmation of the author: Serge Carfantan, 2007, lesson 163: Wisdom and revolt

... and reread Serge Carfantan too ...
0 x
Twandering with clayey and fertile wheat, full of water in winter, cold in spring, crushed and cracked in summer,
but that was before the Didite ...
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13625
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1499
Contact :

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by izentrop » 19/07/18, 22:37

A crazy series barely caricatured on Arte.
https://www.arte.tv/fr/videos/069802-00 ... on-2-7-12/
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Christophe » 24/07/18, 19:00

This Belgian is right:

0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Christophe » 02/10/18, 17:34

How Europe found a psycho-manipulative trick to make us "better" accept the future liter at 2 € ... quite simply by removing the (historical) name of the fuels! Too strong the Eurocrats! : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:

https://lexpansion.lexpress.fr/actualit ... 37917.html

Geometric shapes will replace the names indicated at the pump, throughout the European Union, from October 12.

Small revolution at the pump. As part of European harmonization, all fuel labeling in the Union will change, from October 12. "Diesels" and "lead-free" will henceforth be identified by geometric shapes.

new-signage-of-fuel-en-europe.jpeg
new-signaling-fuels-in-europe.jpeg (43.81 KIO) Accessed 6213 times


Round for gasoline, square for diesel
All petrol-type fuels will thus be indicated by circles, the letter "E" accompanied by a number. The idea is to indicate to the consumer the maximum content of biofuel (ethanol in the case of gasoline, hence the "E"). This gives "E5" for the classic unleaded SP95 and SP98 (composed of 5% bioethanol), "E10" for the unleaded 95-E10 and "E85" for the super-ethanol.

Same principle for gas oils; in a little more complicated. They will be indicated by squares inside which we will read the codes: "B7", "B10" and "XTL". The "B" denotes, as in the case of gasoline, the maximum biofuel content. The only one on sale today is the "B7", but soon there will be the "B10" and, one day, the "XTL", which will denote a synthetic diesel (which is just starting to be produced), that is - that is, not derived from crude oil.

Finally, gaseous type fuels will be identified by a diamond, or "diamond", which will give the nature of the gas: "H2" for hydrogen, "CNG" for compressed natural gas, "LNG" for liquefied natural gas , or "LPG" for petroleum gas.

Smooth transition
No worries, however, for those who have trouble remembering the new signage: it will cohabit a time with the old, so that consumers get used.

In addition to the pumps and guns, it will also be indicated on the tanks of all new vehicles sold from the October 12, to avoid any mistakes. If in doubt for older vehicles, the European Car Manufacturers Association recommends contacting a car dealership.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Christophe » 15/10/18, 09:37

Monday morning humor:

43879651_10215407527873744_277240671532744704_n.jpg
43879651_10215407527873744_277240671532744704_n.jpg (90.62 KB) Viewed times 6081
1 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Janic » 18/10/18, 18:27

new book by Stéphane Horel on the otomy lobby
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Christophe » 19/10/18, 20:56

Not bad: https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/ ... o/desobeir

After a video of Brut, online media of small videos broadcast on social networks, the philosopher Frederic Gros has become a true mascot networks. The opportunity to revisit his book "Disobey" published last year by Albin Michel.

Ethics and politics

Indeed, in these troubled times in democracy, the question of disobedience and its corollary, vigilance, seems quite essential. I reassure you right away, Frédéric Gros's book is not a manual of rebellion, nor a long psychologizing digression on the revolt. No, Disobedience is a profound and well-argued question, according to the old Socratic tradition, of the ethical sense that animates each person who immerses himself in the work.

This is one of the undeniable talents of its author: to question the reader's report to obedience and disobedience and to show him that obedience must not be a political or social habit, but an ethical decision .
Obeying someone or something is above all obeying oneself, listening to one's internal coherence, being attentive to one's responsibilities and one's sense of humanity.
That is why disobedience can sometimes be necessary, precisely to preserve this internal coherence, this sense of humanity necessary for our survival.
According to Frédéric Gros, his book is an attempt to "understand, by questioning the ethical conditions of the political subject, why it is so easy to agree on the desperation of the current order of the world, and so difficult yet to him to disobey? "

Man, animal, machine

The difficulty is there. It often seems much easier to obey than to disobey. But, according to the philosopher, obeying it is not only simpler, it is also, most often salutary, since it is only in obedience that we come together and recognize each other.
Frédéric Gros then reviews the disobedient figures of our time: the turbulent schoolchildren, the lazy, the bad workers, the thugs, all these people who are "abnormal", "unsuitable" who do not want to obey the norms imposed by society. Incapable of resisting their impulses, they are powerless to affirm their humanity.
Only here, the previous century also showed us how obedience could lead to the worst inhumanities. Thus, the opposition between man and the disobedient animal has been replaced, in the second modernity, by the opposition between man and the obedient machine. It is here that Frédéric Gros recalls the specificity of man, who can never be reduced to a tissue of various influences and determinisms, but who is above all a being capable of feeling, thinking, judging. It is this specificity of man that makes him able to disobey.

Obey and disobey, risks and perils

Often, disobeying seems too risky, too expensive. The one who disobeys is the one who sows the disorder.
In reality, as Frédéric Gros shows, this vision of disobedience as carrying chaos comes from a specific ideology. Certainly the hierarchy is unfair and the social harmony a decoy, but to disobey it is only to add harm to the evil.
One can be lucid and even critical, but it is always better to obey.
For Frederic Gros this obedience is an over-obedience. This same over-obedience to which Boetie attacks in his text on voluntary servitude.
As there are many ways to obey, there are also many ways to disobey, such as obeying at least, resisting peacefully or not cooperating.
Frédéric Gros does not skimp on the examples and revisits the great figures of the resistance: Antigone, Henry David Thoreau, but also the figures of blind obedience by returning at length on the trial of Eichmann, who, he, has not stopped to claim the morality of his obedience.

What do you really agree to in a society?

This detour allows Frederic Gros to ask an essential question, that of consent. What do you really agree to in a society? To obey the laws or to make society? If you only consent to society, then nothing can prevent citizens from replaying the existing contract.

In this case, in the words of the author, civil disobedience "updates what has never existed (the consent and the signing of a contract) and gives rise to this moment of origin where a collective decides its destiny. ". Which explains why some leave the ranks, decide to disobey, to break the collective to give back to him its conditions of possibility. This moment of disobedience is a solitary moment, a salutary return to oneself to better return to others.
Once the mechanisms of disobedience are unveiled, Frédéric Gros engages in a meditation on the need to find the point of balance: obey with dignity, disobey ethically.

To find that balance, you first need courage: to dare to think by yourself, to dare to break with the other.
So it's a lot more of an ethical issue than a moral one. This is the conclusion of the author: "our existence is our work", it is up to us to make ourselves worthy.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules




by Christophe » 26/11/18, 23:25

0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 117 guests