Well, it took you a while to realize it! but I thought you had put an end point !!!!I would not make the point not know your answer 18h40, it tires me in advance because I realized that it is useless.
I do not ask you to be mine either, you should re-read yourself! You would not have asked a question, I would not have had to give my opinion.I do not ask you to be of my opinion, I already know that you have not been from the beginning and it does not bother me at all.
I am not your guru and you certainly have your own "spiritualist" references without the need of others, unless you doubt yourself.I thought we could move forward, progress together in a common exploration but obviously it does not interest you, that's not what motivates you.
What motivates me is not to lose myself in so-called spiritualities as substitutes for a difficulty in living one's own incarnation, it comes out of the role of the psychiatrist rather than a discussion on the internet and I am not a therapist ...in this domain.what motivates you is to be right in your bubble.
Rather misleading to some abstract discourses. We are made of flesh, of matter and it is this which concerns us, not an abstract metaphysics.as Orpheus said: can be a little deaf?
It does not come from Wikipedia, lost! Cicero, cited, is a Roman observer of societies and gives a definition of religion according to this social aspect. We are culturally heirs to a multitude of systems religious or allegedly such. It does not give the "metaphysical" as physical meaning of the term and as my references are not Wikipedia, there is therefore a notable difference as to its real meaning related to such or such a culture or philosophy.Yes you baffled on uninteresting co..ies, take a look at Wikipedia to look at the etymology of the word religion,
It was even necessary to start thereI stop there, the list of points to take over would be too long and that's what I did not want to do.
You would understand that you are a model of honesty. We often judge others in relation to his own situation!What bothers me is the off-topic, dishonesty,
Example?you say one thing and then support the contrary, the fact that you take up again as something new, something that I just said before, it shows your non listening or not integration of the speech of the other.
I know what I say, not to follow a straight line, a straight road, a highway of the mind, but I do not roll cushy that on country roads with all its varieties of landscapes, villages, turns and that's what interests me and so much better if others in a hurry prefer highways!
Listen to what? Views of the mind (which I respect elsewhere) but my "materialism" reminds me of the concrete of each day.Whether we agree or not is not important for me but to progress in an exploration, it is necessary to listen to the other one.
To imagine this an anecdote: A very pious catholic lady dedicated her life to the misery of others, spending herself without counting (it's beautiful!) But at the same time she had a serious diabetes that handicapped her in her life and her activities . As we discussed, I pointed out to her that, given her condition, it is soon from her that her "patients" should take care and that support would become a burden for her community and that she needed to get up to speed. the foot to take care of it FIRST in order to be available as long as possible for others. It's spirituality CONCRETE. But my point of view did not seem interesting to him either, final point concerning it.
I'm wasting my time, not interesting, final point about myself.
Pilate said to Jesus, " what is the truth? "So what is spirituality for all of us? it would already be necessary for everyone to come up with his own definition before speaking about it.Glad to have known you on the side of spirituality.
PQS: you should listen to this video and the following questions about how to get cancer!
that's concrete spirituality
