Monsanto Roundup deadly to humans - Glyphosate

[izentrop]

it is not a substantive judgment on glyphosate.

I agree, but in the USA, they spend enormous amounts on the basis of moralizations imposed by the activists and without any scientific basis, it is also good that certain authorities take decisions in the right direction. They are rare because foremost career plan.

[Janic]

Janic wrote:
A civil judgment does not claim to provide a scientific answer

Good to take

Obviously, get out of your bubble!
NOTE: I have examined the site we can do everything and your active participation as here. Same phony references of your pseudo pseudoscience, your cosmic teapots and other funny things of the same kind.

perseus

As the Law teachers say, "Law is not Justice, Justice is not Morality".

beautiful formula and oh how realistic.
But what counts is precisely to distinguish each part while taking into account the others without which neither law, nor justice and therefore moral could not exist.

[izentrop]

It happened on ARTE last night.

The recipe is simple: A background of truth, shocking images, white coats for the serious side and a risky scapegoat (owner of a substance in the public domain since 2000). It was Marie-Monique Robin who initiated the principle in 2008 http://www.ecolopedia.fr/?p=3423
Substance that is part of a panel of pesticides that are dangerous for some that are badly used or banned, but it is always this one that is highlighted.

Don't you think that this kind of manipulative media montage should be regulated, especially broadcast on a channel with a reputation of "cultural"?
Especially that the honesty of the 2 sureties of the film is not questioned and yet https://quoideneuf.housseniawriting.com ... -seralini/
http://seppi.over-blog.com/2017/10/la-c ... apers.html

Janic, please try not to bring us your usual first degree reaction, thank you.

[Janic]

Janic, please try not to bring us your usual first degree reaction, thank you.

When one of your bloggers writes, to use his own expression "shit", you can only react. It does not matter if it is glyphosate, GMOs and other "crap", these guys are going out of their way to credit their beliefs, which is their right as for everyone. But there again, to make scientism to give an air of I know everything in the name of HIS science, with great blows of Web, that does not bring any credit to his leucorrhea. as:

In the same way that Andrew Wakefield has discredited immunization globally, putting many people at risk,

this kind of fake new will find its listeners who, for the most part, have not followed this affair and which it has drawn on one of these media against which it fulminates, like you. This is how he says? ... shit, ah, yes!

[Ahmed]

Logorrhea and not leucorrhea ...

[Bardal]

Logorrhea and not leucorrhea ...

That too is to do scientism to give myself an air of I know everything in the name of HIS science.

And then, leukorrhea, it is treatable by homeopathy ... By cons logorrhea, it is less safe ...

[Janic]

Ahmed wrote:
Logorrhea and non leucorrhea

exact! Revealing gap!

That too is to do scientism to give myself an air of I know everything in the name of HIS science.

effectively! I readily admit that I am one of the scientists in all the parts which are not the subject of my so-called professional skills.
But it must be rather widespread among all those who meddle in science without being specialists. These same specialists are already shared themselves, so we too!

And then, leukorrhea, it is treatable by homeopathy ... By cons logorrhea, it is less safe ...

Not only! leucorrhea is also part of the "pathological" signs associated with some.

[Ahmed]

Bardal, you write:

That too is to do scientism to give myself an air of I know everything in the name of HIS science.

This remark constitutes a profound misinterpretation as to the meaning of scientism ...

[Bardal]

Bardal, you write:

That too is to do scientism to give myself an air of I know everything in the name of HIS science.

This remark constitutes a profound misinterpretation as to the meaning of scientism ...

Totally irrelevant ... But it's not very serious ...

[Christophe]

http://www.leparisien.fr/societe/glypho ... 850088.php

Jean-Claude Terlet, a farmer near Soissons, has brought Monsanto to justice that he considers responsible for his prostate cancer. For him, the legal victory of a Californian gardener against the giant of phytosanitary products raises tremendous hope.