Of course it disfigures the landscape, it's ugly a lost cathedral in the middle of the trees of a forest or even in plain, even in a desert ... .. sand, of course!I do not think Strasbourg Cathedral disfigures the landscape ...
And the Effel tower? This bunch of horrible junk that has no use other than to run the trade, etc ... One of the wind turbines is even less ugly with their beautiful trunk all smooth, very white and branches that flutter over the wind. Everything is relative, therefore!
There are in France near 100 000 religious buildings (on average 2,5 per municipality), including 15 000 protected as historical monuments including 154 cathedrals, 171 basilicas,plus all tall buildings, it's ugly all that!on the other hand 4000 wind turbines (3MW) and 180m heights
And how high are the American buildings, and the one in Abu Dhabi?
We must not confuse aesthetics and utilitarianism. Wind turbines, with all their inevitable flaws, are intended to use a non-polluting energy, not to be an ecological ideal(pretty much what it takes to replace a nuclear plant) it's not the same thing ..
Among others!but at least it's a visual reminder of where our energy comes from.
For the sand, as long as there are oceans it will always remain! what is problematic are the places where these samples are taken.