Rare earth: not so rare it

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by moinsdewatt » 04/05/17, 22:49

The only major rare earth mine in the US is the Mountain Pass mine, which unfortunately is bankrupt (Chapter 11 in the USA).

A recovery proposal is on the table.


Bidder boosts hopes of rare earth mine in Mountain Pass

Posted: 04 / 26 / 17 MOUNTAIN PASS

The hope of restarting what was the rare earth mining and processing plant in the Western Hemisphere - located in San Bernardino County - received a large boost.

ERP Strategic Minerals LLC, has been selected by the 11 trustee for Molycorp Minerals LLC.

The Mountain Pass mine, located in San Bernardino County, about 50 miles south of Las Vegas, once employed about 500 before shutting down 2015.


The shutdown happened just after a redesigned and re-engineered state-of-the-art processing facility, costing some $ 1.7 billion, becoming fully operational.

A decline in rare earth mineral pricing was a major factor in the decision to suspend production, officials said at the time.

If ERP is successful in purchasing the Mountain Pass through the 11 bankruptcy process, it will work with San Bernardino County and others to restart the mine, the company said in a statement.

In bankruptcy parlance, the first bidder is known as "stalking horse bidder."


"We are here (Wednesday) pleased to note that the ERP Strategic Minerals for the Mountain Pass mine," said David Wert, San Bernardino County spokesman.

The opening bid held by ERP Strategic Minerals, which is part of the ERP Group of Companies, in Natural Bridge, Virginia, "said Mike Luther, spokesman.

"At this junction, we believe there are other interested parties," he said.
.........................

Image
ERP Strategic Minerals LLC, Molycorp Minerals LLC. PHOTO FILE



http://www.sbsun.com/business/20170426/ ... ntain-pass

and they put 100 $ millions at stake:

ERP Floats Bid Worth $ 100M For Molycorp's Rare Earth Mine
April 25, 2017
..............
A dirty hearing would be set for June 23 in Delaware short bankruptcy, according to short records.

The stalking horse must be approved by the bankruptcy court, and Molycorp Minerals has asked for a hearing on the subject of being scheduled for May 15.
...............

https://www.law360.com/articles/917096/ ... earth-mine

To be followed by the 23 June.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by Exnihiloest » 04/05/17, 22:54

Ahmed wrote:...
Of course the UN and the big "things" give pride of place to an abstract monetarist conception (it is all the easier as a qualitative approach would be almost a puzzle, it must be admitted), but this 'is a discussion that would be endless and the main thing is not to define poverty according to a more or less relevant "scale", no, what is important is the relationship between the lowest and highest incomes , as well as the quantitative distribution according to the populations concerned. Indeed, it is the relative wealth which conditions the power of the ones over the others, these power relations which respectively determine the dependence and the domination. By the extension of monetarization, the subjection grows because of the growth of inequalities and far from being this accidental phenomenon that you recognize, it is about a structural reality.

I share this view but with nuance because it only speaks of principles, not of its application, but the devil is in the details. For example, the "ratio of the lowest to the highest incomes", which should not be exceeded? Too low a ratio can demotivate the entrepreneur and it is the overall wealth that will suffer ...

As for the "destruction of the" existing "system, it is indeed a prerequisite for the cessation of the general destruction of living conditions on earth.

There is no widespread destruction of living conditions on earth, but a relative deterioration, related to demography and the improvement of the standard of living from the XNIXXth century to the present day. Every medal has a setback.
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12309
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2970

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by Ahmed » 05/05/17, 13:31

I share this view, but with nuance ...

It is without doubt that there is a misunderstanding somewhere! : Lol:
On the second point, you say exactly the same thing as me, with other words and, obviously, a different appreciation, since we do not have the same criteria ...
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by Exnihiloest » 05/05/17, 18:41

Ahmed wrote:
I share this view, but with nuance ...

It is without doubt that there is a misunderstanding somewhere! : Lol:

I'm counting on you to clear it up. Come on, you have to get a little wet. "Ratio between the lowest income and the highest" that you brought to the table: how much at the max and for what reasons?
On the second point, you say exactly the same thing as me, with other words and, obviously, a different appreciation, since we do not have the same criteria ...

"exactly" ?! : Shock:
The image you have of what I'm saying is therefore a black and white scan. Converted to black and white, my painting may be yours too, but you went from 24bits per pixel to just one, forgetting the nuances. Yet it seemed to me that the words had a definition and that "degradation" was not synonymous with "general destruction".
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by moinsdewatt » 09/12/17, 13:53

Burundi: Gakara becomes the first rare earth mine to enter production in Africa

Ecofin Agency 06 dec 2017

The mining company Rainbow Rare Earth announced Tuesday that it has exported its first shipment of rare earth concentrate from its Gakara project in Burundi. The entry into production of the mine gives the company the status of sole producer of rare earths in Africa and one of the few producers outside of China.

"This is a moment of pride for all those involved in the company and we look forward to increasing our monthly production levels over the next few months by targeting a production rate of 5 000 tons per year by the end of the year 2018. "commented Martin Eales, CEO of the company.

Rare earths are a group of 17 metals from scandium to lanthanides. They have exceptional properties, which explains their use in the manufacture of high-tech products (batteries of electric and hybrid cars, LEDs, smartphones chips, laptop screens, photovoltaic panels).


https://www.agenceecofin.com/terres-rar ... en-afrique
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by moinsdewatt » 03/02/18, 14:20

Rare metals: "An electric vehicle generates almost as much carbon as a diesel"

By Marine Ernoult - 1 February 2018

In his latest book, "The War of Rare Metals", Guillaume Pitron denounces "the hidden face of the energy and digital transition". For the journalist, wind turbines, solar panels and electric cars are content to move pollution to the other end of the world.

Iridium, indium, platinum, rare earths: these metals with sometimes unknown names are essential for the high-tech industries. Without them, no electric batteries, wind turbines, cell phones or fiber optics. The journalist Guillaume Pitron was interested in the environmental and geopolitical consequences of the extraction of these rare metals. On the occasion of the release of his book The War of Rare Metals, he looks back on six years of investigation across a dozen countries.
....................


http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2018/0 ... el_1625375
1 x
dede2002
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 1111
Registration: 10/10/13, 16:30
Location: Geneva countryside
x 189

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by dede2002 » 04/02/18, 13:27

I agree with what he writes except for this sentence:

"No more state wants to reproduce the neocolonialist pattern according to which developing countries produce raw minerals, sell it a handful of dollars to Westerners; and the latter value it with a few patents to resell it ten times more expensive."

Because the scheme he describes is still current in several African states, it is even the Westerners who come to serve, there is no sale but a small discount (2% in Madagascar) on the value of gross product exported ...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by Christophe » 19/02/18, 14:30

Interesting!!

http://www.novethic.fr/actualite/enviro ... 45464.html

The energy transition opens a new page in French mining history

This is the hidden face of the energy transition, the one we do not want to look too closely because it disturbs. In our wind turbines, our solar panels or in the batteries of our electric cars, there are rare metals extracted for the vast majority in China under disastrous environmental conditions. This raises the question of the reopening of mines in France, necessarily cleaner but very difficult for the population to accept.


We are no longer going to look at our feet in the same way ... Because in our basements there is potentially hidden an unsuspected treasure. If the last mines - coal in Lorraine and gold in Languedoc-Roussillon - closed in 2004, an extractive revival was born at the end of the 2010 years. For the first time in thirty years, exploration permits were again granted in France and a dozen exclusive mining research permits to find metals.

In question, the soaring price of metals at the world level and a reduction in exports of some of them by China on which we are very strongly dependent. This prompted Arnaud Montebourg, Minister of Productive Recovery, to launch a national mining company in 2014. Strategy taken up the following year by the Minister of the Economy at the time, Emmanuel Macron, who created a "responsible mine" committee and assured that France "will reopen mines".

Hypocrisy

“France is a dormant geological monster,” says Michel Bonnemaison, president of Mines du Salat. He is currently working on a tungsten mine project in Ariège, which he believes could rank in the top 3 in the world and cover our needs at the national level. This material, currently 84% produced by China, is particularly essential to the high-tech industry, which goes hand in hand with the energy transition (smart grids, autonomous cars, connected objects, etc.).

"We could potentially open a dozen mines on our territory, confirms Charles Nicolas, geologist within the BRGM (Bureau of Geological and Mining Research). But we prefer to be hypocritical and import these minerals from countries that are much less environmentally conscious. We talk a lot about renewable energies, but to manufacture our wind turbines, our electric cars, our solar panels, we need metals and therefore mines. "

Germinal

The mere mention of the reopening of mines provokes a real epidermal reaction in France. “In the minds of people, mines are Germinal, continues Charles Nicolas, but we have made a lot of progress since. Like any industrial activity, mines have an environmental impact but we know how to limit as much as possible and that we masters much better than in the past. "

It is the famous concept of "responsible mine" dear to Emmanuel Macron, but slammed by opponents. On the ground, the response is organized and citizens' groups are multiplying against the reopening of metal mines in Brittany or in Limousin where appeals have been filed with the administrative court to challenge the granting of exploration permits. What to discourage entrepreneurs and investors.

All-round mines

"It would be easier to bet more on recycling", estimates Philippe Bihouix, engineer specializing in metals and author of "The age of low tech". Currently rare earths and some high-tech metals are only recycled at less than 1%. "But it is often more expensive to recycle than to extract metals from mines. To make recycling more competitive, it would therefore be necessary to raise the price of metals and for that to close mines or avoid opening new ones."

An explanation that does not hold in a market dominated by China where the law of supply and demand does not exist. "It is the Chinese who decide the price of metals because they are in a quasi-monopolistic position. They will therefore have no problem in artificially lowering prices to keep this market of the future because they know what they have to gain from it. ", retorts Guillaume Pitron, journalist and author of" The metal war, the hidden face of the energy and digital transition ".

According to the CNRS, more metals will be needed in the next 30 years than what the previous 500 generations consumed. "To meet these exponential needs, it will effectively improve recycling, better eco-design of products, develop substitution strategies, fight against planned obsolescence, but also open mines in all directions, concludes Guillaume Pitron. Here and elsewhere. . "
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by moinsdewatt » 19/02/18, 21:17

Faced with the rise of cobalt prices, recycling is making its way

By Claire Fages RFI 16 February 2018

It is the key ingredient of electric batteries. Cobalt has seen its prices nearly triple since the beginning of last year. The DRC, which produces half of the global supply, is about to multiply by five its royalties on this strategic metal. So battery manufacturers are looking to save resources and recycle cobalt from old phones.

How to consume less cobalt, to calm the prices of the gray metal? The idea of ​​recycling, which did not seem technically obvious to industrialists, is gaining ground. The world's largest manufacturer of electric batteries Samsung SDI has announced this week that it intends to recycle cobalt content in old smartphones.

The subsidiary of the Korean giant is also researching to use in its lithium-ion batteries much less cobalt, or no cobalt at all. Samsung SDI has thus developed a prototype electric vehicle battery containing less than 5% cobalt and 90% nickel.

10% royalty in the DRC

Without a recycling or substitution solution, cobalt prices will continue to soar. The ton of cobalt has already gone from 30 000 dollars at the beginning of last year to over 81 000 dollars today, its price has almost tripled in just over a year. The rise has accelerated since mid-January when the Kinshasa authorities announced a reform of their mining code in one country, the Democratic Republic of Congo, which produces more than half of the world's supply.

In the last version of this code, the royalty would change from 2% to 10% on DRC strategic metals, including cobalt. The superprofits tax would be greater than 50%. Which means that Congolese metal will cost more on the world market.

Cobalt demand multiplied by eight in 2026

Difficult to reconcile with the consumption projections for electric vehicles. The annual demand for cobalt is expected to rise from 12 000 tonnes today to 95 000 tonnes in ten years, a multiplication by eight, according to raw material analysts at CRU. Now 10% of the annual production of cobalt ends up in mobile phones and there are already more than a billion and a half. "This is an incredible, totally untapped deposit," says the CEO of Umicore, one of the largest producers of cathodes for electric vehicle batteries.

When this field of smartphones stagnates, already anticipates Samsung, it will extract the cobalt batteries of electric vehicles in turn scrapped. According to projections from an Australian waste consultant, Randell Environmental Consulting, the number of discarded lithium-ion batteries is expected to increase by 20% per year, by 50% per year just for old electric car batteries. A deposit that is really extraordinary.

http://www.rfi.fr/emission/20180216-fac ... son-chemin
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Rare earths: not so rare




by moinsdewatt » 20/02/18, 20:41

China, a virtual monopoly on rare earth production

Posted on 24 January 2018 by Pierre Thouverez

If the rare metals are thirty, the "rare earth" group 17 of the most strategic for new technologies. China provides 95% of the production of these coveted lands. A quasi-monopoly that greatly benefits the Middle Kingdom.

Rare metals are a big family. They contain 17 rare earths, graphite, cobalt, antimony, tungsten, tantalum, platinum, iridium, ruthenium, niobium and some others. They are not necessarily rare around the globe. However, their deposits large enough for exploitation to be commercially profitable with current technologies are.

A well thought out Chinese strategy

For six years, journalist Guillaume Pitron has conducted the survey of rare earths and metals in a dozen countries on four continents. He gives a poignant testimony in his book The War of Rare Metals. His report is clear: China now dominates that of rare metals. It is the virtually unique supplier of the most strategic of them, the rare earths. If their annual production limited to 130.000 tons, against 2 billion tons of iron, may seem anecdotal, it is capital and indispensable to many new technologies. LEDs, flat screens, electric cars, permanent magnet wind turbines, mobile phones, computers demand their weight of rare earths.

In the early 1990 years, China began selling rare-price rare earths. The Californian mines that provided the majority of the market, had to close their doors in the 2000 years, the miners had to put away their picks. Other countries that have resources, including Russia, Greenland, Canada, Vietnam, the United States, and even France have abandoned or neglected the exploitation. Only master on board, China is now its law on the market. As a result, it now concentrates 95% of the world's rare earth production, whereas it would only hold 36% of the reserves. The situation could change in a decade, because China could decide to reserve all of its rare earth production to its own companies, as the demand of its industry is important. Mines from other countries could reopen.

Major environmental impacts

During his investigation, Guillaume Pitron discovered that the extraction of these rare metals generates important environmental impacts. Extraction and separation processes require a lot of energy, chemicals and water. In China, sulfuric and hydrochloric acids pollute rivers in the vicinity of mines. The media echoed the pollution of various rivers and the formation of mountains of waste. These extractions have been accompanied by a rise in considerable diseases and cancers among residents. Despite the ban on wild activities under the impetus of Chinese public opinion, the black export market would remain thriving. Some ten thousand mines would be scattered throughout the Chinese territory.

The question to Guillaume Pitron: The world is becoming Western. With its barriers to mineral exports, what is China looking for?

For the past fifteen years, China has implemented a policy in which it restricts its exports of raw minerals to keep added value. She does not want any more of the colonialist line where Westerners would seek only matter and transform it at home. China puts export quotas, but gives unlimited access to companies that come to settle in the country. It covets the downstream of the sector, that is to say the high-tech industries using rare earths. It asks these companies to provide industrial structures, jobs, know-how, research and development laboratories. And she uses that knowledge for her development. While at the end of the 1990 decade, Japan, the United States and Europe accounted for 90% of the magnets market, China now controls three-quarters of global production! The Chinese have the intention to win the battle on the downstream of all the technologies of the future and it works. The country is already the leader of green technologies in the world. It is the world's largest producer of green energy, the largest manufacturer of photovoltaic equipment, the largest hydroelectric power plant, the largest investor in wind power, and the world's leading new-energy car market.

This rare earth situation in China is replicated in other countries with majority positions. In Asia, Africa, Latin America, a powerful phenomenon of nationalism of mineral resources increasingly weakens Western positions. Locally exploited resources must fuel domestic consumption rather than satisfy the appetite of a client country.

https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/act ... res-51380/
0 x

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 183 guests