Remundo wrote:
A multitude of "inventors" seek perpetual motion, and other superunitary mechanisms.
Among all this research, there are those who try the unbalanced wheels (like yours), according to various techniques.
However, no physics experiment has ever shown that gravitational force provides energy gain on a trajectory closed to an object. From here on, any unbalanced wheel without an internal or external source of energy, whatever its articulations / internal mobilities, can at best conserve its energy, and in reality, its internal or external friction (with the air by ex) irreversibly slow it down to a complete stop.
If you build your wheel, you will only be able to see this phenomenon, unless we find a way to communicate energy to your masses so that they go back periodically.
Cordially !
A multitude of "inventors" seek perpetual motion, and other superunitary mechanisms. : a wheel could possibly be perpetual (even if I cannot prove it) but it will not be superunitary for all that, any mechanical object has a yield lower than 100
Among all this research, there are those who try the unbalanced wheels (like yours), according to various techniques. : out of the thousands of hilarious things I've seen, I've seen only one technique / idea but varied that will never work.
However, no physics experiment has ever shown that gravitational force provides energy gain on a trajectory closed to an object. From here on, any unbalanced wheel without an internal or external source of energy, whatever its articulations / internal mobilities, can at best conserve its energy, and in reality, its internal or external friction (with the air by ex) irreparably slow it down, until a complete stop: it is true but it fits all that I said above, until today 1 only idea to demonstrate (levers, masses in direct, or other things but it's still the same concept)
If you build your wheel, you will only be able to see this phenomenon, unless we find a way to communicate energy to your masses so that they go back periodically. : it is feasible but we are no longer in the field of physics but simply logic
a bit like a magnetic motor everyone has broken their teeth until today and for good reason, in all the assemblies that I have seen, there are as many "pushbacks" as there are blockages so gain = 0 ditto for the mechanical wheels until now, a "FIXED" force which goes down and which must go up, to arrive at the top (without counting the losses) the gain is also 0
the ultimate goal to create a perpetual motion wheel is a bit like a real electric motor, to create not one but several forces, some will be added and others will cancel out or both at the same time to make them variable forces and pick the right time to (I'll go back to what you said above) "unless we find a way to impart energy to your masses so that they come back up periodically .." but the we don't do not speak of going back up but of "switching / commuter" when forces are canceled or in other words "in vertical equilibrium", the or other masses will be added to continue to rotate the wheel
(Well, for now, it's science fiction ....... or gibberish choice :-))