Exnihiloest wrote:The problem is that today we are no longer in the domain of reason, but emotion, which is carefully maintained by the actors, the scientists of the IPCC themselves, the environmentalists, the politicians and the reporters who take back all that they are told without a screen, and the alarmists of all kinds, including the partisans of degrowth.
But emotion is stronger than reason. The rational discussions on the subject become impossible.
This is not wrong, except that you are confusing between the scientific reality of the phenomenon and its recovery by the techno-economic apparatus.
The IPCC is an interface between the scientific world and the politico-economic world.
In the same way ANSM serves as an interface between pharmaceutical lobbies and the medical world ...
and alarmists of all kinds which supporters of the decline.
Do you often hear of supporters of the decline in the media?
If yes, which ones?
Their weight in the decision-making process?