Ahmed goodnight
I have often learnedly explained to me that being composed of animal proteins, it was necessary for me to consume it in order to manufacture them and replenish their stock, therefore to eat cow (called "beef" for convenience!).
Yet the cow is also composed of animal protein ..
.
To judge the value of arguments, we must determine the origin and it is linked to multiple factors, few of which are dietary, but more cultural and financial.
Well, at this point I will admit that the digestive system of the cow is fundamentally different from mine, but conversely, I do not see what I would look like a carnivore ...
Actually we are neither one nor the other, or a mixture of both.
Some primitivists advocate a diet based on raw vegetables and meat on the pretext that our ancestors were hunter-gatherers. I doubt that these arguments are solid: the prehistoric period is by far the longest of the human adventure, we are very ignorant of these very remote times and it is quite improbable that a single nutritional configuration is prevailed over such a long time ...
Always right! The only way to be certain is scientific by anatomical comparison. Or anatomically we do not have NO natural means for grazing or predation. The rest is a question of socio-cultural situations of nutritional adaptation.
It is certain that food opportunism has contributed significantly to the expansion of the human species ...
It's still a misconception widespread. Actually confused geographic expansion (and there predation may play an important role) and digital expansion much easier by physical inactivity and suitable food abundance.
Sen no sen
Quote:
but the body absorbs typically less bine the vegetable protein than animal (this is called the "biological value")
proteins having the best assimilation rates are in order eggs, followed by milk and soy, it is a fact check.
The disadvantage of this kind of talk is that it separates the rapid assimilation (often confused with digestibility) and physiological overall balance. What interest is there to roll very quickly if the consumer follows the same curve? Eco-driving is to play on the different settings for maximum performance with minimum consumption. So some products such as meat, eggs, dairy products result in negative balances in terms of transit of intestinal putrefaction, constipation, etc ... that worsen with age and thus various diseases naturally disappear after removal the offending products.
The reduction in consumption is considered beneficial;
In a sense, yes, as with any reduction in anti-physiological products like alcohol, tobacco, or any other drug of the kind "
an okay three hello havoc"whereas all damage starts with anti-physiological consumption, but the culture has a tough skin.