Ahmed: the last example given is on page 25 (in the conclusions)
Then there is only the bibilography. Nevertheless, I would surely take the words out of your mouth by saying that we must be wary of any excessive enthusiasm on the economic system of
"Soziale Marktwirtschaft". In my corner, we also have ours (considering the German-speaking majority of the country):
https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... aK6Vvl.pdf
Since you are referring to Protestantism, this system of governance has something of Anglo Saxon in the genes (this is what was noted above with Mc Gregor, and before him Taylorism, only Herzberg, Masslow and a third of which i 'forget the name just now have made shy advances amha).
In the 70s the same paradigm prevailed under Margaret Thatcher and Keith Joseph for a time. Their goal was not so much to rush into the said system as to prove that only a pure market economy could allow "social progress (vs a social market economy). They obviously abandoned it later rather quickly in the profit from the current system of predation - more sophisticated and perverse - that I call the new management (benchmarking and monitoring at all levels towards a culture of results and excessive optimization and above all continuous evaluations that undermine relations between colleagues and leads to a kind of
mobbing behavior institutionalized, which leads to
burnout (even to suicide once the lemon has been completely squeezed) and all this under the supposedly convivial regime of
bottom-up, to circulate information from the base directly to the top of the hierarchy - which gives the illusion of "being important" - and although effective, is only an additional level of surveillance while giving workers, the feeling of a strong corporate identity through their personal commitment, except that: this is not the goal sought by management, but rather the increase in productivity and profitability at all costs.
To add to this intense stress, comes the precariousness of workplaces (turnover, tolerated immigration which puts a big pressure on wages down) and the low labor costs of certain countries end up making the work environment that is often unlivable in the medium term. Whatever, the workers end up changing jobs and leaving feathers there.
When it cracks, it hurts: statistically half of the population would use a shrink during their life ...
And for the result, we see where we are! To have reached the point where whole swathes of the real economy should reach returns approaching those of speculative investments is mind-boggling ... All the more so since this situation leads investors to lose interest in the real economy , except startups, as long as they are very promising ...! The Yankees made us walk on the head ... and which government is complaining loud and clear? None, we rather give them the bank account numbers of those who place their captives with us under the threat of blackmail and we go to bed to save our distribution networks installed there, because they are the ones who hold the knife by the handle..
In the meantime, the social gains obtained after long struggles are erased one after the other. This is how they impose THEIR “economic model” on us.