patent using tesla
One could reflect on what is true, doubtful or impossible in Tesla's patents, precisely, seriously, scientifically, but econology trolls release anything, without ever deigning to read and learn, and flow these topics !!!
I gave you what Tesla completely missed as discoveries !!!
And I admire those who have not missed them, these real discoveries !!!
Faraday, Maxwell, Hertz, Roentgen, Eisntein, Planck, Heisenberg, Debroglie, Dirac, Fermi, etc.
But you don't know anything about them, while their findings are in everything you use every day !!
I ignored others, because these trolls will still pollute for dozens of pages of false dreams !!
I gave you what Tesla completely missed as discoveries !!!
And I admire those who have not missed them, these real discoveries !!!
Faraday, Maxwell, Hertz, Roentgen, Eisntein, Planck, Heisenberg, Debroglie, Dirac, Fermi, etc.
But you don't know anything about them, while their findings are in everything you use every day !!
I ignored others, because these trolls will still pollute for dozens of pages of false dreams !!
0 x
The discoveries of Faraday, Carnot, Maxwell, Hertz, Roentgen, Planck, Einstein, Dirac, etc. do not require reading their patents, to realize their importance in everyday life.
Anyway, janic explained that in the patents we do not put what allows to make them work, to block the copiers from stealing the patent !!!
So no need to read all the patents, unusable, while the publications of revolutionary discoverers are to read, because clear and essential steps for humanity !!
Tesla missed discoveries because he didn't have a scientific approach.
Anyway, janic explained that in the patents we do not put what allows to make them work, to block the copiers from stealing the patent !!!
So no need to read all the patents, unusable, while the publications of revolutionary discoverers are to read, because clear and essential steps for humanity !!
Tesla missed discoveries because he didn't have a scientific approach.
0 x
- plasmanu
- Econologue expert
- posts: 2847
- Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
- Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
- x 180
dedeleco wrote:Tesla missed discoveries because he didn't have a scientific approach.
Too intuitive the type.
A charlatan?
Does not refer to his peers.
Speak in riddles.
altruistic: Generous and selfless: not good !!!
a big fat revolutionary, what !!!
He gives a definition of science against the tide.
It is to improve humanity, science knows nothing and seeks to fill its knowledge gaps.
Why a scientist is a researcher.
A researcher who knows everything is more of a researcher. It is GOD.
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
Hello Dedeleco
No one said the opposite, only the people cited limited themselves to their (often unique) discovery, contrary to Tesla's inventive profusion. (you quote Marconi who was dismissed from his priority on his discovery ... discovery before him by Tesla. Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States)
That's right, but that doesn't define the pointlessness of invention. Almost (it seems you haven't read his biography) he would have needed huge credits to exploit ALL of his patents, while only some had the necessary credits.
This is to presuppose that these patents would not have revolutionized society when he was precisely ahead of many conservative researchers.
To wonder what do you mean by a scientific approach?
The discoveries of Faraday, Carnot, Maxwell, Hertz, Roentgen, Planck, Einstein, Dirac, etc. do not require reading their patents, to realize their importance in everyday life.
No one said the opposite, only the people cited limited themselves to their (often unique) discovery, contrary to Tesla's inventive profusion. (you quote Marconi who was dismissed from his priority on his discovery ... discovery before him by Tesla. Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States)
Anyway, janic explained that in the patents we do not put what allows to make them work, to block the copiers from stealing the patent !!!
That's right, but that doesn't define the pointlessness of invention. Almost (it seems you haven't read his biography) he would have needed huge credits to exploit ALL of his patents, while only some had the necessary credits.
So no need to read all the patents, unusable, while the publications of revolutionary discoverers are to read, because clear and essential steps for humanity !!
This is to presuppose that these patents would not have revolutionized society when he was precisely ahead of many conservative researchers.
Tesla missed discoveries because he didn't have a scientific approach.
To wonder what do you mean by a scientific approach?
0 x
To wonder what do you mean by a scientific approach?
Clearly janic never studied scientific work of these great past discoverers, to become aware of the fundamental difference between science and patent process, sometimes dreams.
Tesla has hardly put anything in its publications and patents that subsequently triggers discoveries in functional chains in enormous numbers, like Faraday, Maxwell, Hertz (him triggered by Maxwell (and others before, which Maxwell synthesized), Roentgen, Einstein, De Broglie, Dirac, Fermi, Purcell, etc.
The true deep scientific understanding of the reality of our universe leads to avalanches of discoveries, which Tesla did not do with its 800 patents, most of which were impossible to develop in a useful way, despite the enormous enthusiasm it aroused with dreams, which none of the enthusiasts managed to achieve. shape.
If janic doesn't agree, I invite him to concretize in reality in functional form, only one of the patents of Tesla, classified in the unrealizable dreams, so far.
The scientific method is to prove the reality of our world, by reproducibility, constantly verifiable by all. , as the laws of electromagnetism, discovered by Faraday and Maxwell, are constantly verified, every time we use any device, TV, telephone, GPS, nuclear etc.
janic should realize, that this is not following his instinctual impulses, his feelings, arbitrary and superficial dogmas or religions, as janic does, but a work of patience, careful, thorough, accepting reality with great care, for that it be reproducible, by all, understandable and coherent, verifiable at every moment by paying attention with great care and rigor, not to mix everything wrong, as I see constantly on econology, with in addition the refusal to make the necessary efforts of rigor and understanding of centuries of scientific work.
This is why it is necessary to cite the references to read, at each moment, as I do, instead of despising and hating them, like janic, these works decades, even centuries of very careful research.
It is even a subject of the BAC today, duty to seek the truth !!
0 x
Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 157 guests