warming up everyone does not care ... as long as there is cheap oil it will be wasted
so the price will go up, and the process of fuel synthesis will become profitable ... but not to consume like today: it will be more expensive and it will have to drive less ... have less powerful car ... better organize the company to avoid unnecessary transport
the current fast transport makes me laugh in a country where the rare ones still working are always in a hurry, and where 3millons of perssone are officially left unemployed (and even more if we counted better)
Change the world, a whole program. By JM Jancovici
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
The rise of the seas, we will not be long, Venice already !!!
http://www.notre-planete.info/actualite ... _Terre.php
http://www.notre-planete.info/actualite ... _Terre.php
0 x
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
- sen-no-sen
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6856
- Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
- Location: High Beaujolais.
- x 749
dedeleco wrote:The theories of abiotic oil are considered by most (99,9%) geologists to be invalid
There are more than 60 years ago most geologists said the same, invalid for continental drift, despite indisputable evidence almost obvious, with Wegener !!
Gosse, I still remember, having read at the end of the course chapter, a few lines on Wegener, and remained very frustrated at the impossibility of knowing more about these essential and forgotten facts in the course of geography !!
The fashion of a moment is not a proof, only the facts are proof.
So that's very strong!
You are the first to treat others as negationists on topics such as AIDS (with respect to alternative theories), however, on the subject of abiotic oil, you advance a thesis that is not validated scientifically and curiously do not bother you!
The fashion of a moment is not a proof, only the facts are a proof.
And the facts are that the large oil reserves have been discovered and are in the process of drying up.
Even if they are abiotic (which is not the case) it does not change the concept of peak oil, because all things are limited.
And it is an absurdity to say that this lode does not exist underground going back to the surface, CH4 and oil by natural catalysis in very high pressure, at high temperature with catalyst minerals, underground, of all kinds!
Explain to me why there is no abiotic oil eruption on earth?
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 98 guests