Radioactive waste in our everyday objects

[dedeleco]

And there are still some that are everywhere in homes and gardens in France and Japan, long before Fuushima !!
see nhk.org !!! or criirad.org

[stipe]

Info or intoxicating, below is the link to an experience that could go to the industrial stage in a little over 10 years, and which would considerably reduce the lifespan of our radioactive waste!

http://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2012/01 ... echets.php

Good news in sight?

[Janic]

hello stipe
it's flashy! Brown has already demonstrated that his gas caused nuclear radioactivity to fall at a rate indistinguishable from natural ambient radioactivity. But despite its efficiency and its ridiculous cost, the authorities have turned their backs on this means!

[dedeleco]

Better than nothing, but not a word on the energy balance of the electrical energy necessary to destroy all the waste produced by our 58 nuclear reactors ????

In other words, how many nuclear reactors will it take to destroy long-lived waste produced by all French nuclear reactors ?????

Since radioactive atoms always end up in long-lived and even eternal elements like lead, the remaining amount of long-lived waste is very important, like the amount of energy obtained in nuclear power plants, and therefore a good proportion of this energy is needed fast neutrons (so a lot of energy, to make them fast, much more than for slow neutrons !! ) to disintegrate long-lived waste and make it much more radioactive waste with shorter life, over centuries instead of hundreds of thousands of years !!!

In energy, at my whim (muddy, given the complexity), I place that between 25% and 5% of the nuclear energy given by these reactors, to lay this troublesome waste.

Our little children will use a lot of solar energy to destroy the waste and radioactive junk that we leave them shamelessly!!!!!

and janic still without any references for uluberlu of the marvelous movement type:

Brown has already demonstrated that his gas caused nuclear radioactivity to fall at a rate indistinguishable from natural ambient radioactivity. But despite its efficiency and its ridiculous cost, the authorities have turned their backs on this means!

Why doesn't he demo this gas on the radioactivity that is everywhere to save the world?

[Janic]

Why doesn't he demo this gas on the radioactivity that is everywhere to save the world?

When there are zozos like you who are permanent skeptics, this means is not likely to be used. If not for the references done like me: research, there is not only Wikipedia in the world of information!
Here is how I am not cow this extract to put you, and other curious of this site, on the way.

Peterson wrote: " Brown placed a strip of americium on a brick with small pieces of steel and aluminum for two minutes under the flame. After having melted, the metals emitted a flash which made Brown say, that the radioactivity was destroyed. Before the experiment, americium (which comes from plutonium) emitted 16.000 curies per minute. It did not emit more than 100 after, the value of radioactivity naturally present in the laboratory before the experiment".

It goes without saying that other experiments have been tried with the same success!

[dedeleco]

jokes

who don't eat anything, like janic, who refuses references !!

When we tell things to sleep standing up, inconsistent with each word, showing total ignorance, it is impossible to believe religiously like Janic !!

[Janic]

as for ignorance, you are not in a bad position, sir I know everything!

[dedeleco]

gentleman = google = 7 billion humans I know everything!