Wind, would we have been lied to?

[Ruthenian]

And when we "fart", we do not release methane?

[highfly-addict]

Yes, of course ! But as for CO2, we do not add carbon in the "machine" ... except of course in the case mentioned by Dédé.

[Christophe]

Mmm there that is discussed! My first remark was already going in this direction hhihihi https://www.econologie.com/forums/post212093.html#212093

Because already CH4 has a stronger power on the greenhouse effect than CO2 (21 times) and that it is not absorbable by plants (I believe) unlike the CO2 cycle (of human respiration) which it actually remains in a loop ...

Also, it is necessary to take into account the indirect costs necessary for human consumption (fertilizer, transport, packaging, distribution, recycling ...) etc etc ...

In the end, modern human food is not as carbon neutral as that !!

Casino has been posting the CO2 content of some of its products for a few months ... you should inquire about the calculation method!

But we are completely HS there

[highfly-addict]

Mmm there that is discussed! My first remark was already going in this direction hhihihi https://www.econologie.com/forums/post212093.html#212093

Because already CH4 has a stronger power on the greenhouse effect than CO2 (21 times) and that it is not absorbable by plants (I believe) unlike the CO2 cycle (of human respiration) which it actually remains in a loop ...

Ok, but the atmospheric afterglow is shorter ... and flatulence has always existed.

Also, it is necessary to take into account the indirect costs necessary for human consumption (fertilizer, transport, packaging, distribution, recycling ...) etc etc ...

In the end, modern human food is not as carbon neutral as that !!

Casino has been posting the CO2 content of some of its products for a few months ... you should inquire about the calculation method!

But we are completely HS there

Completely agree, and in this sense, we actually "eat" petroleum .... Even when we eat organic!
The only solution, food self-sufficiency at local level thanks to renewable energies: it is not won!

[Christophe]

Flatulence yes, but for what volume, for what biomass, for what rate of other GHGs?

In any biotope there is a point not to be exceeded ... otherwise the balance is broken ... (and in paragliding it's the same )

To stay in the HS: we even eat a lot of oil! 2L per person per day in rich countries.

We had a subject on it: https://www.econologie.com/forums/alimentati ... t8851.html

You should also know that 40 to 50% of food is wasted in these same countries ...

[izentrop]

3 times more than nuclear, not counting intermittency

[Remundo]

ah because you evaluate the nuke at 5 gCO2/kWh?

and no worries about radioactive waste of course...

[izentrop]

Don't worry, they are well managed, except for Greenpeace and all the news traffickers

[Christophe]

3 times more than nuclear, not counting intermittency

And how many times less than Russian gas? Oh damn, there's no more Russian gas!

[Janic]

22/08/22, 09:32izmentrop

Don't worry, they are well managed, except for Greenpeace and all the news traffickers

what bullshit. We are not good at managing things in the very short term, and morons like you are stupid enough to believe that these jokers are able to manage waste over thousands of years when they, the jokers, will be long dead. and that they will no longer have to account for their destructive madness..