...and hop! You only pick up what suits you, and the rest of the arguments fall through the cracks ...! I answer you quickly and then I move on to something else.
Like the debate on 9/11 (and many others) you are definitely a kind of incapacitated! Unable to participate in a discussion in a forum apart from a binary clash. Unable to answer your interlocutors by taking into account all their arguments fairly. Unable to weigh the pros and cons, without irreversibly wanting absolutely to make YOUR argument triumph by all means. Unable to control you in fact ... Or you play troll.
oiseautempete wrote:Obamot wrote:What bad faith, yours? Where is your lack of insight?
And it continues ..., I have
never put the primary choice electricity in heating forward, but only defended the existing installations in a context of good insulation, you change the subject or reinvent new ones like that you arrange history of contradicting me systematically with fallacious arguments or out of context ... more your figures are ridiculous ... the energy / heat efficiency of electric radiators is almost 1 to 1
and not 1 to 3 to 5... values which are not even reached if all intermediate losses in production / transport and processing are taken into account ...
Except that there at least we are sure that you are in bad faith, since we realize that you have picked up the info.
With such an answer, it would be zero pointed to fac ..
oiseautempete wrote:And you are talking about wood when all the forests of France would not be enough (in addition to lumber and paper) if everyone used it to heat themselves ...
What a donkey you are! And the CGAAER report?
The share of wood heating with the pelt feeder does not reach 5% in Switzerland ... a land of forests! There is no
"tin chore" with the pellets, these are directly conveyed from the truck to the tank located upstream of the furnace, by compressed air ...
Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries wrote:Forest and wood foundations
"the CGAAER report recently submitted to the Minister of Agriculture on the issue of underexploitation of the forest. He thus proceeded to a retrospective presentation of the volumes of timber sold, compared to the annual forest production: there appears to be a chronic under-exploitation of the French forest [...] There are many reasons for this: accessibility of massifs, size and fragmentation of private forest property, heterogeneity of stands, insufficient incentive forest regulations ... "
And it's the same everywhere else! The forests of Europe as far beyond the Urals and as far as Siberia, are TOTALLY UNDER-EXPLOITED, all experts agree to recognize it! If they had been correctly expolled, those which burned in Russia (a million hectares) in Ukraine, Greece, France, Spain, Portugal and even in Switzerland, should not have gone up in smoke in the same way! And to think that the gigantic mass of wood that burned could have been used to heat us! Putin has even been singled out for having reduced the personnel responsible for maintaining the forests (at the time when he was President), when they constitute a gigantic deposit and that they deserve to be dealt with finally in a correct proportion.
So point of view spurious arguments, I see only yours: because between saying that
"that would not be enough to cover the needs" and chronic under-exploitation ..... There is room, that precisely which consists in encouraging this type of energy until reaching the suitable threshold ...