Projetheus wrote:As said Elephant, for many achievements the stumbling block is located in the point (s) of stop. Or how to complete a complete cycle without having to spend more energy than the system has provided.
Perhaps by taking the opposite view of the equation: "use of the energy supplied by the magnets" = "relative displacement of some magnets with respect to others" "obligation to replace the magnets in the configuration of 'origin'. In other words, use this potential energy of attraction or repulsion with almost no relative movement.
The example below shows how one can draw a force between 2 magnets with a minimum of relative movement between them.
Let us assume that the above balance is in balance between the strength of the magnets and those of the small and the large spring. If we remove the small one we obtain a "pressing force" of the same magnitude as F1. And if we use this same force F1 we return to a relative equilibrium without having moved the magnets. It is thus this way there that I followed.
Hello Projethée,
It seems that this is the basic principle of the operation of your machine.
could you develop and clarify this passage?