Hello,
Feeling concerned by all energy / pollution problems, I wanted to share with you an idea that I thought of.
Dams use the kinetic energy of water. They are interesting because it is a "clean" and inexhaustible energy.
Only here, the dams flood huge areas and we can not do much.
I had thought of a hollow column system (for example 50 or 100 meters high) along cliffs. Pipe systems on top of these cliffs would lead rainwater to these "giant hollow tubes" to fill them. We would have an opening at the base that would let the water out at very high pressure in order to turn a turbine that would produce electricity. We could put several tubes next to each other.
Thus, we could take advantage of rainy weather to create energy. I think it should be exploited wherever possible (sun, wind, tide, ...).
The relief is a possibility to create strong pressures. At least we are not flooding km². It's always that taken and then it's free and infinite (well you have to make the "giant tubes".
Thank you for reading.
Idea of renewable energy from the rain
50 to 100m in height only create 5 to 10 bars of pressure, so they are not very high pressures but they can be enough to turn turbines; that said, natural sites allowing the collection of rainwater (generally river) + cliffs are quite rare (it amounts to collecting existing waterfalls), unless you create collecting channels on the cliff tops >> financially not very profitable since it will only work when it rains and the infrastructure to be set up is enormous.
0 x
- Former Oceano
- Moderator
- posts: 1571
- Registration: 04/06/05, 23:10
- Location: Lorraine - France
- x 1
I had thought of a hollow column system (for example 50 or 100 meters high) along cliffs. Pipe systems on top of these cliffs would lead rainwater to these "giant hollow tubes" to fill them. We would have an opening at the base that would let the water out at very high pressure
we don't do that already with penstocks of 1 or 2m in diameter with a kaplan pelton or francis turbine below, in the mountains
after it is true that there would be "sites" without playing the Chinese and pharaonic projects, but the investment to date is it worth the cost?
in a short decade with an oil that will be worth 3 4 5 or X the current price, lots of projects will be viable without very heavy work and
we will do indoor sports (biking, rower ... to warm up
ou
we don't do that already with penstocks of 1 or 2m in diameter with a kaplan pelton or francis turbine below, in the mountains
after it is true that there would be "sites" without playing the Chinese and pharaonic projects, but the investment to date is it worth the cost?
in a short decade with an oil that will be worth 3 4 5 or X the current price, lots of projects will be viable without very heavy work and
we will do indoor sports (biking, rower ... to warm up
ou
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 4 Replies
- 2792 views
-
Last message by izentrop
View the latest post
29/06/22, 09:51A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 8 Replies
- 4415 views
-
Last message by swift2540
View the latest post
22/06/11, 23:25A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 7 Replies
- 5366 views
-
Last message by Macro
View the latest post
21/03/11, 08:35A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 49 Replies
- 25593 views
-
Last message by sen-no-sen
View the latest post
20/05/18, 18:48A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 268 guests