I have not yet measuring means
needless to mount this stuff in my C35 Citroen to go do the technical control measure, since it only measures other than opacity nothing! no measure of NO or NO2
a Current filters diesel particle arrest the big particle safe and pass the most dangerous fine!
a classic old diesel which only the big easy stop by my particle system pourait be better than the modern engine and gas plant
the purpose of my stuff to stop NOx is being able to find the maximum compression ratio and maximum performance ... without worrying NOx
diesel tractor: how to purify exhaust gases?
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
This reporter says much less show .... ....
And that:
me seems unusual.
All I have read about pollution with diesel particles is that it is very complicated to understand, measure and interpret .... Between the different chemical species and size families of particle, measurements in mass or number of particles, the use of vehicles (cold / heat / power used) etc all in relation to the health aspect of populations .... there is food and drink. In short, I never understood that the old diesel did not make fine particles, it is "just" the proportions of the parameters mentioned above which change according to the different technologies of engine / pot, use of the engine, proportion of sulfur, quality of engine oil etc ... in which the engine overall the least "toxic" ???????
It builds on what studies to advance this reporter that?
That pushed that to the Diesel car manufacturers, government, oil ????? Not the health aspect in any case ...
And that:
Worse, the filter mechanism creates other molecules: micro particles described by the WHO, which are even more harmful.
me seems unusual.
All I have read about pollution with diesel particles is that it is very complicated to understand, measure and interpret .... Between the different chemical species and size families of particle, measurements in mass or number of particles, the use of vehicles (cold / heat / power used) etc all in relation to the health aspect of populations .... there is food and drink. In short, I never understood that the old diesel did not make fine particles, it is "just" the proportions of the parameters mentioned above which change according to the different technologies of engine / pot, use of the engine, proportion of sulfur, quality of engine oil etc ... in which the engine overall the least "toxic" ???????
It builds on what studies to advance this reporter that?
Industrialists were indeed aware of these risks, but they did what they could to meet the public policies that encourage the purchase of such cars, including through tax benefits. And this is because they are aware of the health impacts of diesel manufacturers invest a lot of money to improve this mechanism, and therefore limit the risks.
That pushed that to the Diesel car manufacturers, government, oil ????? Not the health aspect in any case ...
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
yes it is only the journalist pitch which does not prove much
the problem is that we impose costly solution to a profit which is not proven either
we prepared us euro6 standard and when we will purchase these motor it will be mandatory to maintain and control
Btw the gap on the measurement of particle is known: measuring the total weight of particle, regardless that only the finest are dangerous: it pushes a false progress: motor making less measurable particle ... more dangerous particles
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norme_euro ... ssion_Euro
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norme_europ%C3%A9enne_d'%C3%A9mission_Euro
http://www.usinages.com/automobile-moto ... 06-30.html
the problem is that we impose costly solution to a profit which is not proven either
we prepared us euro6 standard and when we will purchase these motor it will be mandatory to maintain and control
Btw the gap on the measurement of particle is known: measuring the total weight of particle, regardless that only the finest are dangerous: it pushes a false progress: motor making less measurable particle ... more dangerous particles
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norme_euro ... ssion_Euro
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norme_europ%C3%A9enne_d'%C3%A9mission_Euro
(*) Number of particles. A limit value should be set no later than the date of entry into force of the Euro standard 6
http://www.usinages.com/automobile-moto ... 06-30.html
0 x
We must take guinea pigs rats, who breathe their lives diesel fumes, like us, and autopsy their lungs to see the proportion of fine particles in the finer bronchioles (electron microscope) and know the effects depending on the size of particles.
method similar to smoking !!
The worst are the long nanotubes of the diesel particulate, such as fibers of asbestos.
method similar to smoking !!
The worst are the long nanotubes of the diesel particulate, such as fibers of asbestos.
0 x
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
we can think that the future of the car is to make them more and more light and low power: the diesel is worth too small in size because it is unable to turn fast enough: so small gasoline car
but here we speak of the tractor: and when you can make big and heavy diesel long remain the best solution
in a tractor there is no fear of weight, there often added counterweight because it is too heavy! So the weight of a water absorber and limestone genera not if it is well placed
it is often necessary to pass a tractor to the best of people working: a solution to make it clean do not hurt
there is also the public works machine
I think this kind of absorber would also be nice for city bus
but here we speak of the tractor: and when you can make big and heavy diesel long remain the best solution
in a tractor there is no fear of weight, there often added counterweight because it is too heavy! So the weight of a water absorber and limestone genera not if it is well placed
it is often necessary to pass a tractor to the best of people working: a solution to make it clean do not hurt
there is also the public works machine
I think this kind of absorber would also be nice for city bus
0 x
Back to "Air Pollution and solutions against air pollution"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 58 guests